Jesus Tecuanhuey et al v. US Foods, Inc. et al
Jesus Tecuanhuey and Nathan Tecuanhuey |
DOES 1 to 10,, US Foods, Inc., Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., Does 1 to 10 and US Foods, Inc. doing business as U.S. Foodservice,Inc. |
2:2020cv03104 |
April 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 6/29/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (wm) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH U.S.C. 1446(d) filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc.. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 10 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/1/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT OF DECLARATION OF JONATHAN L. BROPHY)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 10, Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Jesus Tecuanhuey, Nathan Tecuanhuey. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/28/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT OF DECLARATION OF JONATHAN L. BROPHY) (ghap) Modified on 4/3/2020 (ghap). |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc., re Declaration #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Declaration #4 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #6 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on April 2, 2020. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 5 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc., identifying 1. Jesus Tecuanhuey, Plaintiff 2. Nathan Tecuanhuey, Plaintiff 3. US Food, Inc. (dba U.S. Foodservice, Inc.) Defendant, 4. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Defendant. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Rich Padilla re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc.. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Jonathan L. Brophy re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc.. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc., US Foods, Inc.. (Rosenberg, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 20NWCV00155 Receipt No: ACACDC-25947487 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants US Foods, Inc., Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc.. (Attorney David Samuel Rosenberg added to party Sedgwick Claims Management Service, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney David Samuel Rosenberg added to party US Foods, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rosenberg, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.