Leemanuel Weilch v. Xuan Ba Lam et al
| LEEMANUEL WEILCH |
| XUAN BA LAM, KENNY I AUH, Does 1 to 10, Kenny Auh and Xuan Ba Lam doing business as Para Liquor |
| 2:2020cv03120 |
| April 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Leemanuel Weilch. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (mrgo) |
| Filing 7 21 DAYS Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Kenny Auh, Xuan Ba Lam. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LEEMANUEL WEILCH. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25953136 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party LEEMANUEL WEILCH(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
