Gigis Inc. v. Gina Butler
Patxi's LTD and Gigis Inc. |
Gina Butler |
2:2020cv03134 |
April 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Patrick J Walsh |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation #14 , the Court hereby grants the 30 days extension to 6/15/2020 for Defendant to file their responsive pleading. (gk) |
Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Gina Butler answer now due 6/15/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Gina Butler. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT)(Miller, Adam) |
Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Adam Isaac Miller counsel for Defendant Gina Butler. Adding Adam I. Miller as counsel of record for Gina Butler for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Gina Butler. (Attorney Adam Isaac Miller added to party Gina Butler(pty:dft))(Miller, Adam) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gigis Inc., upon Defendant Gina Butler served on 4/23/2020, answer due 5/14/2020. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 11 21-Day Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Gina Butler. (gk) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Gina Butler. (shb) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-03134 AB(PJWx). (rn) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gigis Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Face Page of Complaint)(Lu, Robert) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patxi's LTD Patxi's LTD. (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT of Patxi's LTD filed by Plaintiff Patxi's LTD identifying Patxi's LTD as Corporate Parent. (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Patxi's LTD. (Lu, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-25962325 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Patxi's LTD Patxi's LTD. (Attorney Robert K Lu added to party Patxi's LTD(pty:pla))(Lu, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.