Nehemiah Kong v. Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership et al
| Nehemiah Kong |
| Imedra #5900 Family Limited Partnership, Does 1-10, Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc.,, Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. and Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership |
| 2:2020cv03204 |
| April 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2020 at 10:00 AM. See order for complete details. (jre)
|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership, Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc., identifying Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership; Pacific Centers Holdings Inc.; Nehemiah Kong. (Hughes, Kevin) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership, Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc..(Attorney Kevin D Hughes added to party Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin D Hughes added to party Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hughes, Kevin) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT, #19 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court hereby GRANTS the request and the default is set aside. Defendant Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. shall have ten days after the date of this order to file its answer to the complaint. No further extension of time will be afforded to answer. (shb)
|
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of Amanda Seabock filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, re Stipulation to Set Aside Default #19 served on 5/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION to Set Aside Default as to Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Seabock, Amanda) |
| Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Dennis Jay Price, II counsel for Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. Phyl Grace is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Price, Dennis) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than June 1, 2020, by 12:00 PM NOON, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently. PLAINTIFFS FILING OF A MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT or REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL for all defaulting defendants. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a response or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in sanctions and/or the dismissal of this action. See order for further details. (shb)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S OSC RE RESPONSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION, #11 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and hereby DISMISSES Plaintiffs Unruh Act claim WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (shb)
|
| Filing 15 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. a California Corporation (shb) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Amanda Seabock, #2 Proof of service) (Seabock, Amanda) |
|
Filing 13
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff /s to show cause in writing no later than May 15, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant/s Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default on defendant/s OR appropriate request for dismissal of this action. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff/s is due. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership served on 5/3/2020, answer due 5/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mrs. Lim- Wife / Person Authorized in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kongto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIMS.The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than May 1, 2020. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER DETAILS) (lc)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, upon Defendant Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. served on 4/17/2020, answer due 5/8/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: Richard D Kim in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation (early mediation and stay program). (jre) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Imedra No 5900 Family Limited Partnership, Pacific Centers Holdings, Inc. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-25993165 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Nehemiah Kong(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
