In Re Debtor: Scoobeez et al
| Scoobeez |
| Amazon Logistics, Inc. |
| United States Trustee |
| 2:2020cv03230 |
| April 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S MOTION TO ACCEPT DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL INTO APPELLATE RECORD by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant Amazon Logistics, Inc.'s Motion to Accept Documents under Seal into Appellate Record #8 is GRANTED. The Clerk for the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California (the "Bankruptcy Court") is permitted and authorized to transmit to the United States District Court for the Central District of California (the "District Court") Bankruptcy Court Docket Nos. 620, 630, 631, 685 and 686 (the "Sealed Material"), which were received by the Bankruptcy Court under seal. This Court will accept, under seal, the Sealed Material, and the Sealed Material shall be dealt with by the parties pursuant to this Court's usual practices and procedures concerning sealed materials. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE RE: BANKRUPTCY RECORD COMPLETE. Please note, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), this Court has received from the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court either the record for the above-captioned appeal or notice that the record is available electronically. The parties are responsible for reading and complying with all requirements, including briefing, provided in this notice. Appellant must serve and file a brief by 7/1/2020. (gk) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability re Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court Order/Judgment #1 . (gk) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for To Accept Documents Under Seal Into Appellate Record. and Proposed Order filed by Appellant Amazon Logistics, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/12/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Esterkin, Richard) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Appellant Amazon Logistics, Inc., identifying Amazon.com, Inc.. (Esterkin, Richard) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Appellant Amazon Logistics, Inc., re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #5 served on April 20, 2020. (Esterkin, Richard) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 4/3/2020. (jtil) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL: filed by Appellant Amazon Logistics, Inc. Re: Order: (a) determining that the automatic stay applied so as to require Amazon Logistics, Inc. to provide Debtor Scoobeez with business; and (b) denying relief from the automatic stay. Entered on 4/2/2020 by Bankruptcy Judge Julia W. Brand, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 4/2/2020. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:19-bk-14989, Adversary number: N/A, BAP case number: N/A. (Attachments: #1 BK Docket) (jtil)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
