To Be Limited Partnership v. Jude Hudson et al
| To Be Limited Partnership |
| Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson, Gatsby Enterprises, Inc., and Paragon Technology and Development, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv03238 |
| April 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| John F Walter |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 47
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE MOTION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING THE POSTING OF A BOND BY PLAINTIFF PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 800(c) #46 by Judge John F. Walter. The time for Defendants to file said motion, currently due on May 27, 2020, is hereby extended up to and including July 7, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 46 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Motion for an Order Requiring the Posting of a Bond Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section 800(c) filed by Defendants Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Song, Joon) |
|
Filing 45
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for July 6, 2020 at 1:15 PM. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before June 22, 2020. (et)
|
|
Filing 44
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS #43 by Judge John F. Walter. The time for Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is extended up to and including June 17, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 43 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendants Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Song, Joon) |
| Filing 42 STATEMENT Filed Jointly by Defendants Jude Hudson and Rosalie Hudson and Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership Regarding Results of L.R. 7-3, Standing Order Paragraph 5(b) Meet and Confer on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Bond (Song, Joon) |
| Filing 41 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #7 Standing Order served on 05/01/2020. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 40 DECLARATION of Robert Lunny in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Appoint Receiver for to ensure that the Company continues to operate and receive income #12 filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C-Lunny CV 2 pages, #2 Exhibit D-Shareholder Loans/Personal Expenses - 2 pages, #3 Exhibit E-Paragon Balance Sheet - 3 pages, #4 Exhibit F-Paragon Profit and Loss - 3 pages, #5 Exhibit G-Transaction Detail Summary - 1 page, #6 Exhibit H-April 1, 2019 email - 9 pages, #7 Exhibit I-Wire Transfer - 2 pages, #8 Exhibit J-Paragon Transaction Report - 1 page, #9 Exhibit K-Paragon Statement of Cash Flows - 2 pages, #10 Exhibit L-Notice of Articles - 2 pages, #11 Exhibit M-March 16-18, 2020 email string - 5 pages, #12 Exhibit N-March 20, 2020 email re termination - 2 pages, #13 Exhibit O-March 20, 2020 email re vacations - 2 pages, #14 Exhibit P-March 21, 2020 email - 3 pages, #15 Exhibit Q-March 21, 2020 text message - 4 pages)(Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 39 DECLARATION of Harvey Belfer in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Appoint Receiver for to ensure that the Company continues to operate and receive income #12 filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Promissory Note 11 pages, #2 Exhibit B-Forbearance Agreement - 2 pages)(Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 38 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnershipto Amended Complaint/Petition #10 to the Order to Show Cause Why Paragon Technology & Development, Inc. Gatsby Enterprises, Inc. Should not be Realigned as Plaintiffs (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 37 DECLARATION of Farhad Novian re Amendment (Motion related), #22 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and OSC re Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendants Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - April 23, 2020 Minute Order (5 pages), #2 Exhibit 2 - Email Chain Between Afshin Hakim and Adam Tate (4 pages), #3 Exhibit 3 - Email Chain Between Joon Song and Adam Tate (3 pages))(Song, Joon) |
| Filing 36 DECLARATION of Jude Hudson re Amendment (Motion related), #22 Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and OSC re Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendants Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - June 17, 2019 Loan Agreement (2 pages), #2 Exhibit B - Amended and Restated Promissory Note (12 pages), #3 Exhibit C - Forbearance Agreement (3 pages), #4 Exhibit D - Email from Jude Hudson to To Be Limited (4 pages), #5 Exhibit E - Email Chain Between Robert Lunny and To Be Limited (6 pages))(Song, Joon) |
| Filing 35 Text Entry Order: Plaintiffs Motion to Appoint a Receiver filed on April 20, 2020 (Docket No. #12 ) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 7-3 which requires the conference of counsel to take place at least seven days prior to the filing of the Motion and paragraph 5(b) of the Court's Standing Order which requires the Joint Statement to be filed 3 days after the Local Rule 7-3 conference. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 34
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EXHIBITS by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel shall re-file the Declarations and separately docket each exhibit and include a meaningful description of each exhibit by May 1, 2020. (iv)
|
|
Filing 33
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PARAGON TECHNOLOGY & DEVELOPMENT, INC. AND GATSBY ENTERPRISES, INC. SHOULD NOT BE REALIGNED AS PLAINTIFFS by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than May 1, 2020 why Paragon Technology & Development, Inc. and Gatsby Enterprises, Inc. should not be realigned as plaintiffs. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (iv)
|
| Filing 32 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership, upon nominal defendant Gatsby Enterprises, Inc., served on 4/27/2020, answer due 5/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gatsby Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership, upon nominal defendant Paragon Technology and Development, Inc. served on 4/27/2020, answer due 5/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Paragon Technology & Devolpment, Inc., a Delaware corporation in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 30 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership, upon Defendant Rosalie Hudson served on 4/27/2020, answer due 5/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Rosalie Hudson, an individual in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership, upon Defendant Jude Hudson served on 4/27/2020, answer due 5/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jude Hudson, an individual in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Julander, Dirk) |
|
Filing 28
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE ISSUANCE OF A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [filed 4/28/2020; Docket No. #22 ] by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff's Second Application is DENIED. If Plaintiff wishes to pursue its request for injunctive relief, it may do so by way of regularly noticed motion after fully complying with Local Rule 7-3 and Section 5(b) of the Court's Standing Order. (iv)
|
| Filing 27 Objection in support re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction #13 filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 26 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Paragon Technology and Development, Inc., identifying Paragon Technology & Development and Gatsby Enterprises, Inc.. (Attorney Sean E Macias added to party Paragon Technology and Development, Inc.(pty:dft))(Macias, Sean) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE Joinder in Opp. to Ex Parte filed by Defendants Paragon Technology and Development, Inc.. and Gatsby Enterprises, Inc. (Macias, Sean) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re Docket No. 22 [Amendment to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction 13 filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of M. Adam Tate)(Julander, Dirk) ] filed by Defendants Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jude Hudson; Exhibits A-E, #2 Declaration of Rosalie Hudson, #3 Declaration of Aaron Lee, #4 Declaration of Farhad Novian; Exhibits 1-3)(Attorney Joon Song added to party Jude Hudson(pty:dft), Attorney Joon Song added to party Rosalie Hudson(pty:dft))(Song, Joon) (Entered: 04/29/2020) |
| Filing 23 [PROPOSED ORDER Filed as] Amendment to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction #13 Proposed Order filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) Modified on 4/29/2020 (iv). |
| Filing 22 Amendment to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction #13 filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Adam Tate)(Julander, Dirk) |
|
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE ISSUANCE OF A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [filed 4/20/2020; Docket No. #13 ] by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff's Application is DENIED. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of M.Adam Tate re Order to Show Cause, #15 Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION of Harvey Belfer re Order to Show Cause, #15 Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of Robert Lunny re Order to Show Cause, #15 Why the Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Robert Lunny)(Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of M. Adam Tate re Order to Show Cause, #16 Why the Action Should not be Dismissed Pursuant to Forum Selection filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE by Judge John F. Walter.Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than April 22, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed pursuant to the forum selection clause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (iv)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John F. Walter.Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than April 22, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (iv)
|
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #10 as to Defendant Gatsby Enterprises, Inc., Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson, Paragon Technology and Development, Inc. (iv) |
| Filing 13 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to for Issuance of a Preliminary Injunction filed by plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of M. Adam Tate, #2 Proposed Order) (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 12 *STRICKEN* NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Appoint Receiver for to ensure that the Company continues to operate and receive income filed by plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. Motion set for hearing on 6/1/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Robert Lunny, #2 Declaration of Harvey Belfer, #3 Declaration of Brent Gephart, #4 Declaration of Peter Davis, #5 Proposed Order) (Julander, Dirk) Modified on 5/1/2020 (sr). |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #10 filed by plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E)(Julander, Dirk) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (et)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Jude Hudson, Rosalie Hudson, Paragon Technology and Development, Inc.. (car) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Julander, Dirk) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Exhibit was not flattened or sanitized. Attachment 2 and Attachment 3 should be e-filed separately and in the correct event. The Summons event is located under Civil Events Service Documents Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints. The Certificate of Interested Parties is located under Civil Events Other Filings Notices. The Civil Cover Sheet is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (car) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (iv) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (iv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26003232 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff To Be Limited Partnership. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-E, #2 Summons, #3 Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Dirk Odell Julander added to party To Be Limited Partnership(pty:pla))(Julander, Dirk) (iv). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
