Young Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
| Young Yil Jo |
| Mr. Eric Garceti, Proland Management, Six Unknown Names Agents, Mr. Donald Trump, Presbyterian Wilshire Church and Dep Hud |
| 2:2020cv03368 |
| April 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| George H Wu |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPLY filed by Plaintiff Young Yil Jo (hr) |
Filing 4
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, no later than May 25, 2020, why the action should not be dismissed. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint Form, #2 CV-60P Form) (hr)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by plaintiff Young Yil Jo. (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsDep Hud, Eric Garceti, Presbyterian Wilshire Church, Proland Management, Six Unknown Names Agents, Donald Trump pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
