Kimberly Robbins v. Andrew Saul
Kimberly Robbins |
Andrew Saul |
2:2020cv03489 |
April 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
David O Carter |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Timothy R Bolin added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Bolin, Timothy) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robbins, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 4/21/2020, answer due 8/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
Filing 10 Text Only Entry - Pursuant to Order of the Chief Judge No. 20-074, this action is stayed. The deadlines set by the Case Management Order (ECF No. 9) are suspended until the stay is lifted. It is so ordered. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (See order for details.) (Attachments: #1 Statement) (es) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: GRANTING #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (es) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robbins, (Shvarts, Michelle) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Kimberly Robbins. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robbins. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robbins. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Kimberly Robbins. (Attorney Michelle J Shvarts added to party Kimberly Robbins(pty:bkmov))(Shvarts, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kimberly Robbins v. Andrew Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kimberly Robbins | |
Represented By: | Michelle J Shvarts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Timothy R Bolin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.