Ana P. Gomez v. FCA US LLC et al
| Ana P. Gomez |
| FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FCA US LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv03549 |
| April 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 19PSCV00400, acknowledged on 6/17/2020. (gk) |
| Filing 22 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, East District. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Clerk, Los Angeles Superior Court, East District. (gk) |
Filing 21
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand #12 is GRANTED. The case is hereby REMANDED to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 19PSCV00400. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
|
Filing 20
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to Los Angeles County Superior Court #12 presently scheduled for hearing on June 12, 2020, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC.. (Yasuzawa, Brian) |
| Filing 18 DECLARATION of Julian A. Moore In Suppot Of Plaintiff's Meet And Confer Efforts In Advance Of Rule 26 filed by Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Moore, Julian) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 4/20/2020, the Court set a Scheduling Conference #9 . As required by the Court's 4/20/2020 Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rule 26-1, counsel are required to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. To date, a Joint Rule 26(f) Report has not been filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing no later than 6/5/2020, why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to cooperate and participate with opposing counsel in a Rule 26(f) conference and for failure to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. The filing of a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by the deadline will be deemed a satisfactory response. Failure to timely respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution. The scheduling conference on 6/12/2020 is hereby VACATED and will be rescheduled if necessary. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 filed by Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez. (Moore, Julian) |
| Filing 15 OPPOSITION IN OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Yasuzawa, Brian) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
|
Filing 13
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff's motion to remand to Los Angeles County Superior Court #12 is hereby continued from May 29, 2020 to June 12, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. Further, the scheduling conference #19 is continued from June 5, 2020 to June 12, 2020 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez. Motion set for hearing on 5/29/2020 at 09:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand To State Court, #2 Declaration of Julian A. Moore In Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand To State Court, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Remand To State Court, #6 Proof of Service) (Moore, Julian) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez, identifying FCA US LLC. (Moore, Julian) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Julian Alexander Moore counsel for Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez. Adding Julian Alexander Moore as counsel of record for Ana P. Gomez for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez. (Attorney Julian Alexander Moore added to party Ana P. Gomez(pty:pla))(Moore, Julian) |
| Filing 9 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/22/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 6/5/2020 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/31/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, FCA US LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Ana P. Gomez. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/30/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian Takeya Yasuzawa counsel for Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Adding Samantha Brignoni as counsel of record for FCA US LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Yasuzawa, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian Takeya Yasuzawa counsel for Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. Adding Brian Yasuzawa as counsel of record for FCA US LLC for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant FCA US LLC. (Yasuzawa, Brian) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (Yasuzawa, Brian) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. (Yasuzawa, Brian) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19PSCV00400 Receipt No: ACACDC-26117014 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian Yasuzawa in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Brian Takeya Yasuzawa added to party FCA US LLC, a Delaware limited liability company(pty:dft))(Yasuzawa, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
