Law Office of Sabrina Damast et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
| BNG Restaurant Group, Inc., Eye Land Optometry, Umezu Enterprises, LLC and Law Office of Sabrina Damast |
| DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 2:2020cv03591 |
| April 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Consuelo B. Marshall to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-03591 SVW(AFMx). (rn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:20-cv-03588 ODW(JCx) (rn)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A. (Attachments: #1 Bank of America, NA) (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs BNG Restaurant Group, Inc., Eye Land Optometry, Law Office of Sabrina Damast, Umezu Enterprises, LLC, (Ruga, Dylan) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs BNG Restaurant Group, Inc., Eye Land Optometry, Law Office of Sabrina Damast, Umezu Enterprises, LLC. (Ruga, Dylan) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs BNG Restaurant Group, Inc., Eye Land Optometry, Law Office of Sabrina Damast, Umezu Enterprises, LLC. (Ruga, Dylan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs BNG Restaurant Group, Inc., Eye Land Optometry, Law Office of Sabrina Damast, Umezu Enterprises, LLC. (Ruga, Dylan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT [FEE PAID Receipt No. ACACDC-26146125] filed by Plaintiffs Umezu Enterprises, LLC, Law Office of Sabrina Damast, BNG Restaurant Group, Inc., Eye Land Optometry. (Attorney Dylan Ruga added to party BNG Restaurant Group, Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Dylan Ruga added to party Eye Land Optometry(pty:pla), Attorney Dylan Ruga added to party Law Office of Sabrina Damast(pty:pla), Attorney Dylan Ruga added to party Umezu Enterprises, LLC(pty:pla))(Ruga, Dylan) Modified on 4/22/2020 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
