Leap Imports LLC v. Anker Innovations Limited, et al
| Leap Imports LLC |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| Anker Innovations Limited |
| FARHAD NAFEIY, ROES 1-10, inclusive and DATA PRODUCTS (HK) LTD. |
| 2:2020cv03598 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff Anker Innovations Limited, upon Third-Party Defendant DATA PRODUCTS (HK) LTD. served on 6/7/2020, answer due 6/29/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Farhad Nafeiy, Agent For Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lewis, Matthew) |
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff Anker Innovations Limited, upon Third-Party Defendant FARHAD NAFEIY served on 6/7/2020, answer due 6/29/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Farhad Nafeiy in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lewis, Matthew) |
Filing 19
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 7/27/2020 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, #15 as to Third Party Defendants DATA PRODUCTS (HK) LTD., FARHAD NAFEIY. (yl) |
| Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, #15 filed by Third Party Plaintiff Anker Innovations Limited. (Lewis, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff-Third Party Plaintiff Anker Innovations Limited, identifying Anker Innovations Limited. (Lewis, Matthew) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND, THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against ROES 1-10, inclusive, FARHAD NAFEIY, DATA PRODUCTS (HK) LTD., COUNTERCLAIM against Leap Imports LLC filed by Defendant Anker Innovations Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Lewis, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Anker Innovations Limited answer now due 6/19/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Anker Innovations Limited.(Attorney Mark E Gustafson added to party Anker Innovations Limited(pty:dft))(Gustafson, Mark) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC, upon Defendant Anker Innovations Limited served on 4/29/2020, answer due 5/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anker Innovations Limited, a foreign business entity, status unknown in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Baker, Ryan) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC, upon Defendant Anker Innovations Limited served on 5/4/2020, answer due 5/26/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Anker Innovations Limited, a foreign business entity, status unknown in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Baker, Ryan) |
|
Filing 11
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-03598 SVW(ASx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Anker Innovations Limited. (yl) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC. (Baker, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Plaintiff's Notice of Interested Parties Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1 filed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC. (Baker, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC. (Baker, Ryan) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC. (Baker, Ryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26144511 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Leap Imports LLC. (Attorney Ryan G Baker added to party Leap Imports LLC(pty:pla))(Baker, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
