Neurobrands, LLC v. Neurogum, Inc.
| Neurobrands, LLC |
| Neurogum, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv03612 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 8/20/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Neurogum, Inc., identifying NeuroGum, Inc.; Evanston Insurance Company; Neurobrands, LLC. (Jih, Victor) |
| Filing 22 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND, COUNTERCLAIM against Neurogum, Inc. filed by defendant Neurogum, Inc..(Jih, Victor) |
| Filing 21 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by defendant Neurogum, Inc..(Attorney Victor H Jih added to party Neurogum, Inc.(pty:dft))(Jih, Victor) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: GRANTING #15 Non-Resident Attorney Mark A. Cantor APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC, designating William E. Thomson, Jr. as local counsel. (Thrasher, Lupe)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: GRANTING #17 Non-Resident Attorney Rebecca J. Cantor APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC, designating William E. Thomson, Jr. as local counsel. (Thrasher, Lupe)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin: GRANTING #16 Non-Resident Attorney Marc Lorelli APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC, designating William E. Thomson, Jr. as local counsel. (Thrasher, Lupe)
|
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Rebecca J. Cantor to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26194992) filed by plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Marc Lorelli to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26194610) filed by plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Mark A. Cantor to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26194595) filed by plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC, upon Defendant Neurogum, Inc. served on 4/22/2020, answer due 5/13/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lyanne Gares - authorized person at registered agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney William E Thomson, Jr on behalf of Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee n/a. Attorney is a licensed California attorney, admitted to this Court, is currently Active and in good standing. (Thrasher, Lupe) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Rebecca J Cantor on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Marc Lorelli on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney William E Thomson, Jr on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Neurogum, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC, (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Neurobrands, LLC. (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. (Thomson, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26146900 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Neurobrands, LLC. (Attorney William E Thomson, Jr added to party Neurobrands, LLC(pty:pla))(Thomson, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
