William Ali Hassan v. Andrew Saul et al
Plaintiff: William Ali Hassan
Defendant: Andrew Saul and Gail S Ennis
Case Number: 2:2020cv03631
Filed: April 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gail J Standish
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff William Ali Hassan, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F. DeLaRosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Postcard not returned as of date. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Postcard not returned as of date. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. Per F.R.Civ.P., Rules 4(i)(1)(A)(ii) and (1)(B) and 4(i)(2) (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Ennis, #2 Proof of Service on US Atty CD CA, #3 Proof of Service on Atty General (DOJ DC))(Hoffenberg, Howard)
April 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
April 23, 2020 Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Gail S Ennis and Andrew Saul. (jtil)
April 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
April 23, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil)
April 20, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff William Ali Hassan. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons to Ennis)(Hoffenberg, Howard)
April 20, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff William Ali Hassan, (Hoffenberg, Howard)
April 20, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Ali Hassan. (Hoffenberg, Howard)
April 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26150519 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff William Ali Hassan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Agency Decision) (Attorney Howard Leslie Hoffenberg added to party William Ali Hassan(pty:pla))(Hoffenberg, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: William Ali Hassan v. Andrew Saul et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gail S Ennis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Ali Hassan
Represented By: Howard Leslie Hoffenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?