Michael William Houtz v. Andrew Saul
| Michael William Houtz |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv03634 |
| April 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-3634 PJW on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
|
|
Filing 10
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Tina Naicker added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Naicker, Tina)
|
|
Filing 9
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Michael William Houtz. (Kalagian, Marc)
|
|
Filing 8
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael William Houtz, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 5/15/2020, answer due 7/14/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Kalagian, Marc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (es)
|
|
Filing 6
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (et)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (et)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Michael William Houtz, (Kalagian, Marc)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Michael William Houtz. (Kalagian, Marc)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael William Houtz. (Kalagian, Marc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26150832 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Michael William Houtz. (Attorney Marc V Kalagian added to party Michael William Houtz(pty:pla))(Kalagian, Marc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michael William Houtz v. Andrew Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Tina Naicker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael William Houtz | |
| Represented By: | Marc V Kalagian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
