In re Philip James Layfield
| Philip James Layfield and Philip J Layfield |
| Rodney Pimentel |
| 2:2020cv03705 |
| April 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 20-55995 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #18 as to Appellant Philip J Layfield. (jp) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Appellant Philip J Layfield. Appeal of Order on Motion to Dismiss, #17 . (Appeal fee of $505 paid.) (Layfield, Philip) |
Filing 17
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Re: Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Bankruptcy Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction [DE #13 ] by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court GRANTS Pimentel's motion and DENIES Layfield's Motion for Leave to file an interlocutory appeal. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (SEE CIVIL MINUTES FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss TO DISMISS BANKRUPTCY APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION--28 U.S.C. 158(a) #13 filed by Appellee Rodney Pimentel. (Henriks, Yana) |
| Filing 15 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss TO DISMISS BANKRUPTCY APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION--28 U.S.C. 158(a) #13 filed by In re Debtor Philip J Layfield. (Layfield, Philip) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order Designating Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court places Pimental's Motion to Dismiss on calendar for 7/22/2020. Layfield shall file an opposition to Pimental's motion no later than 7/17/2020. Pimental shall file a reply no later than 7/22/2020, at which point the court will take the motion under submission. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The Court stays the briefing on Layfield's bankruptcy appeal until further notice. When the Court issued its ruling on the motion to dismiss, it shall issue a revised briefing schedule for the bankruptcy appeal, if necessary. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss TO DISMISS BANKRUPTCY APPEAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION--28 U.S.C. 158(a) filed by appellee Rodney Pimentel. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibit 1 to RJN, #3 Exhibit 2 to RJN) (Henriks, Yana) |
| Filing 12 APPELLANTS OPENING BRIEF filed by In re Debtor Philip J Layfield. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Excerpts of Record)(Layfield, Philip) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner: granting #10 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (jp)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner, ORDERING Motion for Leave to Appeal Interlocutory Order submitted by Appellant Philip J Layfield received on 5/13/2020 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: This matter is a bankruptcy appeal. Briefs are to be filed pursuant to the Notice re: Bankruptcy Record Complete filed at docket entry 8. Appellant's Opening Brief is due by 06/17/2020. (jp)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE RE: BANKRUPTCY RECORD COMPLETE. Please note, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), this Court has received from the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court either the record for the above-captioned appeal or notice that the record is available electronically. The parties are responsible for reading and complying with all requirements, including briefing, provided in this notice. Appellant must serve and file a brief by 6/17/2020. (jp) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability re Certificate of Readiness and Completion of Record on Appeal #1 . (jp) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Appellant Philip J Layfield. (jp) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL to USDC prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 4/22/20. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of deficiencies in Appeal from Bankruptcy Court filed by USDC. Fees not paid, must be paid to the USBC in 14 days. (esa) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE NOTICE of Appeal Deficiency to Appellant filed by USBC Central District of California. Notice of Appeal fee was not paid. (esa) |
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: ORDER denying defendant Philip layfield's motion for judgment on the pleadings entered on 4/14/20 by Bankruptcy Judge Neil W. Bason, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 4/22/20. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:18-bk-15829 NB, Adversary number: 2:19-ap-1069 NB, BAP case number: NA., filed by appellant Philip James Layfield. (Attachments: #1 bk dkt) (esa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
