Myrica Smith v. DI Logistics et al
| Myrica Smith |
| DOES 1-100, inclusive,, DI Logistics and Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv03734 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 7/27/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (wm)
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant DI Logistics, (Hytrek, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant DI Logistics.(Hytrek, Matthew) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 , for the following reasons: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and/or no copies. (bm)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 5/21/20. ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant DI Logistics.(Attorney Matthew Patrick Hytrek added to party DI Logistics(pty:dft))(Hytrek, Matthew) Modified on 5/21/2020 (bm). |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Myrica Smith, upon Defendant DI Logistics served on 4/28/2020, answer due 5/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon DI Logistics, LLC in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Wasserman, Robert) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 4 Civil Cover Sheet, 5 Proposed Summons are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant DI Logistics. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26202426 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Myrica Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons) (Attorney Robert J Wasserman added to party Myrica Smith(pty:pla))(Wasserman, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
