Garza Palmas et al v. Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc. et al
Manuel Garza Palmas, Ramon Macias Estrada and Manuel Garza |
Ford Motor Company, Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2020cv03816 |
April 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Frederick F Mumm |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc., (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Defendant Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc. (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nicholas Ryan Colletti on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Colletti, Nicholas) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Notice of Removal. It should have been filed and entered separately under its proper event. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/15/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT J AS ATTACHMENT NO. 12 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 .(et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/15/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT H AS ATTACHMENT NO. 10 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants Citrus Motors Ontario, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiffs Manuel Garza Palmas, Ramon Macias Estrada. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/19/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 4 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 5 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. M to the Declaration of Nicholas R. Colletti in Support of Removal as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Spencer Peter Hugret on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation. (Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Related Case(s): MDL No. 2814 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Hugret, Spencer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV11398 Receipt No: ACACDC-26234916 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Civil Cover Sheet, #16 Certificate of Service) (Attorney Spencer Peter Hugret added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Hugret, Spencer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.