Gabrielle Champol v. Andrew Saul
GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL and Gabrielle Champol |
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
2:2020cv03892 |
April 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gabrielle Champol, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 5/4/2020, answer due 9/1/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Ed. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Persky, Jerry) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV20-3892 AGR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Persky, Jerry) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Lynn M Harada added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Harada, Lynn) |
Filing 9 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER HAS BEEN REVISED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2016. PLEASE REVIEW THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. In accordance with General Order 05-01, this case is designated for electronic filing. A chambers copy is required only for the joint stipulation and the certified administrative record. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties shall comply with the following instructions: (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (hr) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by a GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL. (Persky, Jerry) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL. (Persky, Jerry) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Attorney for GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL, (Persky, Jerry) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Attorney for GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL. (Persky, Jerry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Attorney for GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL. (Attorney Jerry Persky added to party GABRIELLE BAILEY CHAMPOL(pty:pla))(Persky, Jerry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.