Bobby Lee Taylor v. United States of America
| Bobby Lee Taylor |
| United States of America |
| 2:2020cv03903 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| John E McDermott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for An Extension of Time to File Amended Writ of Error Cormas Nobis With Memorandum Brief filed by petitioner Bobby Lee Taylor. (es) |
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) CORRECTED ORDER RE PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Dkt. No. 3) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: On May 8, 2020, Petitioner filed a "Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis," which is properly construed as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this habeas action. The motion is granted. (es)
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Docket No. 3) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed on May 8, 2020. The request is GRANTED. (es)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. If Petitioner elects to pursue this action, he is ORDERED to file a First AmendedPetition no later than June 19, 2020, which remedies the deficiencies discussed above. (See order for details.) (Attachments: #1 H C Petition) (es)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Bobby Lee Taylor. (gk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-69) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE), filed by petitioner Bobby Lee Taylor. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bobby Lee Taylor v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Bobby Lee Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
