Tyiavory Jackson v. Armneta Tiggs-Brown et al
Tyiavory Jackson |
Dr. Gian Hernandez, Dr. Cheng Wu and Armenta Tiggs-Brown |
2:2020cv03987 |
April 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen L Stevenson |
Stephen V Wilson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL #2 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. The Request is DENIED without prejudice at this time. (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Tyiavory Jackson. (esa) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by plaintiff Tyiavory Jackson. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants Gian Hernandez(individually), Gian Hernandez(in his official capacity as a doctor for CDCR), Armenta Tiggs-Brown(in her official capacity as a physician assistant for CDCR), Armenta Tiggs-Brown(individually), Cheng Wu(individually), Cheng Wu(in his official capacity as a doctor for CDCR) pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, filed by plaintiff Tyiavory Jackson. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.