Jeffrey William Piontek v. UBTECH Robotics Corp.
| JEFFREY WILLIAM PIONTEK |
| UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv04023 |
| May 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| John E McDermott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Receipt of remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court on 6/5/2020 (lc) |
| Filing 18 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court - Stanley Mosk Courthouse. Case number: 20ST CV 07884. (jp) |
Filing 17
(IN CHAMBER) ORDER REMANDING THIS CASE TO THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT (DKT. #14 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On 5/22/2020, Defendant responded to the OSC and "concede[d] that [the] Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction." Dkt. #15 at 2. Defendant requested that the action be remanded to the Los AngelesSuperior Court. Id. On 5/27/2020, Plaintiff filed a statement of non-opposition to remand. Dkt. #16 . Because there is no subject matter jurisdiction, this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, as Case No. 20STCV07884, at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY to OSC filed by Plaintiff Jeffrey William Piontek. (Roberts, Reginald) |
| Filing 15 REPLY to OSC filed by Defendant UBTECH Robotics Corp. (Fink, Keith) |
|
Filing 14
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Defendant is Ordered to Show Cause why this action should not be remanded to the Superior Court for that reason. Defendant shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause, not to exceed five pages, on or before 5/26/2020. Plaintiff may file any reply, not to exceed five pages, on or before 6/1/2020. The matter will be taken under submission as of that date. (SEE CIVIL MINUTES FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by July 2, 2020. (droj)
|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by DEFENDANT UBTECH Robotics Corp.(Fink, Keith) |
| Filing 11 COUNTERCLAIM against COUNTER DEFENDANT Jeffrey William Piontek; JURY DEMAND, filed by COUNTERCLAIMANT UBTECH Robotics Corp.(Fink, Keith) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Joinder in Complaint. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jeffrey William Piontek, upon Defendant UBTECH Robotics Corp served on 4/3/2020, answer due 4/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Electronic service to robert.vorhees@ogletree.com and angela.pak@ogletree.com in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT E) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, inclusive, UBTECH Robotics Corp. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Jeffrey William Piontek. (FILED IN STATE COURT COURT ON 2/25/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANT UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP, served on 05/01/2020. (Fink, Keith) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE JOINDER filed by DEFENDANT UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP. (Fink, Keith) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by DEFENDANT UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP. (Fink, Keith) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP, identifying UBTECH ROBOTICS LTD. (Fink, Keith) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP. (Fink, Keith) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from LOS ANGELES, case number 20STCV07884 Receipt No: ACACDC-26303687 - Fee: $400, filed by DEFENDANT UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION HERNANDEZ, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT A TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #3 Exhibit EXHIBIT B TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #4 Exhibit EXHIBIT C TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #5 Exhibit EXHIBIT D TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #6 Exhibit EXHIBIT E TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #7 Exhibit EXHIBIT F TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #8 Exhibit EXHIBIT G TO DECL. HERNANDEZ, #9 Declaration DECLARATION RHEE) (Attorney Keith Allen Fink added to party UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP(pty:dft))(Fink, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
