Sarbonne Estate, Inc. v. United States of America et al
| Sarbonne Estate, Inc. |
| United States of America and Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2020cv04081 |
| May 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Real Property: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Joshua L Sohn on behalf of Defendant United States of America (Attorney Joshua L Sohn added to party United States of America(pty:dft))(Sohn, Joshua) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sarbonne Estate, Inc., upon Defendant United States of America served on 5/21/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk, Lillian Arratia. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General William Barr; Assistant Attorney General Lee J. Lofthus. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Civil Process Clerk, Lillian Arratia; Attorney General William Barr; Assistant Attorney General Lee J. Lofthus. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Aspis, Norman) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #7 . Summons was Issued without Signature of Deputy Clerk. See attached Corrected Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (et) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (droj)
|
| Filing 7 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 5/21/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #9 ]- 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (et) Modified on 5/21/2020 (et). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sarbonne Estate, Inc., identifying United States of America, Sarbonne Estate, Inc., Tarwood Finance, Ltd.. (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Sarbonne Estate, Inc.. (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sarbonne Estate, Inc.. (Farrell, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26324823 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sarbonne Estate, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 through 7) (Attorney Michael R Farrell added to party Sarbonne Estate, Inc.(pty:pla))(Farrell, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
