Michael Rhambo v. Flour and Oil Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
| Michael Rhambo |
| Does 1 to 10, Flour and Oil Restaurant Group, Inc., 712 Foothill, LLC and Flour and Oil Restaurant Group, Inc. doing business as Honey Bird |
| 2:2020cv04200 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 712 Foothill, LLC, Flour and Oil Restaurant Group, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 MICHAEL RHAMBO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL RHAMBO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26382643 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MICHAEL RHAMBO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
