Carlos Gomez v. Allegis Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carlos Gomez
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc., Allegis Group, Inc., DOES 1 throught 100, inclusive and Aerotek, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2020cv04232
Filed: May 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2020 Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc.. (Ross, Sarah)
May 8, 2020 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. identifying MEDTRONIC, PLC. as Corporate Parent. (Ross, Sarah)
May 8, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Carlos Gomez; Defendant Medtronic, Inc.; Defendant Aerotek, Inc.; Defendant Allegis Group, Inc.; Mancini & Associates Counsel for Plaintiff; Littler Mendelson, P.C. Counsel for Defendant Medtronic, Inc.; and Epstein Becker Green Counsel for Defendants Aerotek, Inc. and Allegis. (Ross, Sarah)
May 8, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc.. (Ross, Sarah)
May 8, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, case number 20STCV11370 Receipt No: ACACDC-26388274 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sarah E. Ross ISO Removal, #2 Declaration of Horacio Ramirez ISO Removal, #3 Declaration of Shelly Zacharias ISO Removal) (Attorney Sarah Elana Ross added to party Medtronic, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ross, Sarah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlos Gomez v. Allegis Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carlos Gomez
Represented By: Marcus A Mancini
Represented By: Alex K. Hadjian
Represented By: Pamela A Triplett
Represented By: Tara Jennifer Licata
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc.
Represented By: Sarah Elana Ross
Represented By: Nasim Asadi Khansari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allegis Group, Inc.
Represented By: Michael S Kun
Represented By: Alice Kwak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 throught 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aerotek, Inc.
Represented By: Michael S Kun
Represented By: Alice Kwak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?