Daniel Sweeney v. Juan Herrera et al
Daniel Sweeney |
Kim Beakey and Juan Herrera |
2:2020cv04247 |
May 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Ronald SW Lew |
John E McDermott |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (esa) |
Filing 2 EMERGENCY PETITION for Relief for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief for Release from Custody due to risk of exposure and imminent death from Covid-19/Corona virus due to conditions of confinement at Orion House RRC filed by petitioner Daniel Sweeney. (esa) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott,(Filing fee $ due), filed by petitioner Daniel Sweeney. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.