Samantha Vasquez et al v. Lather, Inc., et al
Carlos Quiles and Samantha Vasquez |
Does 1-10 and Lather, Inc. |
2:2020cv04408 |
May 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Labor: Other |
05 U.S.C. ยง 704 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Lather, Inc. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Carlos Quiles, Samantha Vasquez. (Hamner, Christopher) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying Lather, Inc.. (Hamner, Christopher) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Carlos Quiles, Samantha Vasquez. (Hamner, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26458546 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Samantha Vasquez, Carlos Quiles. (Attorney Christopher J Hamner added to party Carlos Quiles(pty:pla), Attorney Christopher J Hamner added to party Samantha Vasquez(pty:pla))(Hamner, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.