Geragos and Geragos, APC v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al
| Geragos & Geragos, APC and Geragos and Geragos, APC |
| Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Eric Garcetti, Does 1 to 10, inclusive and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America |
| 2:2020cv04414 |
| May 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)Order finding Defendants motion to dismiss moot and VACATING the hearing by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The motion to dismiss the complaint, Dkt. #14 , is RENDERED MOOT and the hearing set for July 20, 2020 is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See minutes for further details) (yl)
|
| Filing 26 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #24 filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 25 MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #24 filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kenneth Kupec, #2 Exhibit 1 - Policy, #3 Proposed Order)(Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. Motion set for hearing on 9/14/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Geragos and Geragos, APC. Motion set for hearing on 8/17/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Ben Meiselas, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Meiselas, Benjamin) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Geragos and Geragos, APC, (Meiselas, Benjamin) |
| Filing 21 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Geragos and Geragos, APC(Meiselas, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting #17 Non-Resident Attorney Stephen E Goldman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, designating Theodore J Boutrous as local counsel. (bm)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting #18 Non-Resident Attorney Wystan M Ackerman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, designating Theodore J Boutrous as local counsel. (bm)
|
| Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Wystan M. Ackerman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26543523) filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Boutrous, Theodore) |
| Filing 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Stephen E. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-26543477) filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Boutrous, Theodore) |
| Filing 16 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or Stay #14 filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Boutrous, Theodore) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. Re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or Stay #14 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kenneth Kupec, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Proposed Order)(Boutrous, Theodore) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case or Stay filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. Motion set for hearing on 7/20/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Boutrous, Theodore) |
|
Filing 13
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-03619 PSG(Ex). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo and Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2;20-cv-04414 PSG(Ex). Signed by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (rn)
|
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Wystan M Ackerman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Stephen E Goldman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 25, inclusive, Eric Garcetti, Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut., filed by plaintiff Geragos and Geragos, APC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/10/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Geragos and Geragos, APC, upon Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut served on 4/16/2020, answer due 5/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers Inc.-Agent for Service-By Serving Kaitlyn Mannix in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/17/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT I) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Geragos and Geragos, APC, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon By Electronic Service of Process (Code Civ. Proc. 1010.6(a)) in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/5/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT J) (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal of Action with the Superior Court filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proof of Service)(Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice of Related Case(s) #4 served on May 15, 2020. (Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. Related Case(s): 2:20-cv-03619-PSG-E (Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, (Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Doren, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV14022 Receipt No: ACACDC-26459185 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard J. Doren, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M) (Attorney Richard Joseph Doren added to party Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut(pty:dft))(Doren, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
