Damian Robert Kutzner v. Felicia Ponce
| Warden Felicia L. Ponce |
| Plaintiff Damian Robert Kutzner and Damian Robert Kutzner |
| Felicia L. Ponce |
| 2:2020cv04485 |
| May 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. New Case Number 8:20-cv-00927-JLS. (car) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE in Support of Petition filed by Petitioner Damian Robert Kutzner. (Krolikowski, Adam) |
| Filing 3 Plaintiff's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Damian Robert Kutzner, (Krolikowski, Adam) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Damian Robert Kutzner. (Krolikowski, Adam) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. ACACDC-26489724 for $5 filing fee, filed by Plaintiff Damian Robert Kutzner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (Attorney Adam J Krolikowski added to party Damian Robert Kutzner(pty:pet))(Krolikowski, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
