Adam Hazem et al v. California Mountainback, Ltd, et al
Plaintiff: Alyssa Hazem and Adam Hazem
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive and California Mountainback, Ltd
Case Number: 2:2020cv04488
Filed: May 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY #21 , #22 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The request of California Mountainback, Ltd to substitute Rita R. Kanno as attorney of record instead of Gordon Reid Wallack is GRANTED. (et)
July 16, 2020 Filing 22 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Rita R Kanno in place of attorney Gordon Reid Wallack filed by Defendant California Mountainback, Ltd. (Wallack, Gordon)
July 16, 2020 Filing 21 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Rita R Kanno in place of attorney Gordon Reid Wallack filed by Defendant California Mountainback, Ltd. (Wallack, Gordon)
July 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow this Court's rules and orders. Counsel have failed to comply with the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state that person's name (only if the person is an attorney) and the person's position (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the "weeks before trial" column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. Gordon Reid Wallack has appeared in this matter on behalf of defendant California Mountainback, Ltd. No substitution of attorney has been filed. Therefore, Mr. Wallack remains attorney of record and is required to comply with all of this Court's rules and orders, including the requirement to meet and confer with Plaintiff's counsel and cooperate in the preparation of a Joint 26(f) Report. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with this court's rules and orders, including the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 15, 2020 Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem.. (Attachments: #1 Trial Dates)(Fagan, Craig)
July 15, 2020 Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem.. (Fagan, Craig)
July 15, 2020 Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #15 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by 7/16/2020. Counsel shall adhere to Local Rule 5-4.3.1. (rfi)
July 14, 2020 Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #15 The following error(s) was/were found: all Documents filed electronically must be submitted in PDF format to permit text searches and to facilitate transmission and retrieval. Counsel shall adhere to Local Rule 5-4.3.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (rfi)
July 14, 2020 Filing 15 *STRICKEN* JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Trial Dates)(Fagan, Craig) Modified on 7/15/2020 (rfi).
July 14, 2020 Filing 14 Notice of Withdrawal of Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #13 filed by Plaintiff Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem. (Fagan, Craig)
July 13, 2020 Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem.. (Fagan, Craig)
June 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 7/20/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
June 10, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant California Mountainback, Ltd, (Wallack, Gordon)
June 10, 2020 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant California Mountainback, Ltd.(Attorney Gordon Reid Wallack added to party California Mountainback, Ltd(pty:dft))(Wallack, Gordon)
May 28, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem, upon Defendant California Mountainback, Ltd served on 5/28/2020, answer due 6/18/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Richard Rove in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Fagan, Craig)
May 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
May 19, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant California Mountainback, Ltd. (esa)
May 19, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
May 19, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa)
May 19, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Fagan, Craig)
May 19, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem. (Fagan, Craig)
May 19, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem. (Fagan, Craig)
May 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26490273 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Adam Hazem, Alyssa Hazem. (Attorney Craig P Fagan added to party Adam Hazem(pty:pla), Attorney Craig P Fagan added to party Alyssa Hazem(pty:pla))(Fagan, Craig)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Adam Hazem et al v. California Mountainback, Ltd, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Mountainback, Ltd
Represented By: Gordon Reid Wallack
Represented By: Rita Rebecca Kanno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyssa Hazem
Represented By: Craig P Fagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Hazem
Represented By: Craig P Fagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?