Christopher E. Batres v. Warden et al
| Christopher E. Batres |
| Robert Stricker, R. Cortazar, Warden, Anthony Khuu and P. Finander |
| 2:2020cv04495 |
| May 19, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| John F Walter |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE to Memorandum and Order Dismissing First Amended Complaint #8 filed by Plaintiff Christopher E. Batres (hr) |
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, re re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Plaintiff still wishes to pursue this action, he is granted twenty-one (21) days from the date ofthis Memorandum and Order within which to file a First Amended Complaint. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 CV66 Civil Rights Complaint form, #2 Notice of Dismissal form) (et)
|
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Court finds that exceptional circumstances do not necessitate a request for counsel. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff may ask the Court to revisit this decision should these circumstances change. [See document for further details.] (et)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson: granting #5 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $0 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (hr)
|
| Filing 5 TRUST ACCOUNT (CDCR INMATE STATEMENT REPORT) filed by Plaintiff Christopher E. Batres. (et) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is: DENIED, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court. If submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. (iv)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Christopher E. Batres. (ghap) Modified on 5/20/2020 (ghap). |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants R. Cortazar(TTA-Senior Register Nurse, official capacity), R. Cortazar(indivdual), P. Finander(individual), P. Finander(CP and S/ TSP/CVSP/ CCHCS, official capacity), Anthony Khuu(individual), Anthony Khuu(Register Nurse, official capacity), Robert Stricker(individual), Robert Stricker(Attending Caregiver, official capacity), Warden(official capacity), Warden(individual) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson., filed by plaintiff Christopher E. Batres. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
