Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami v. Pollard
| Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami |
| Pollard |
| 2:2020cv04501 |
| May 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Charles F Eick |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick and Lodging of Proposed Judgment and Order. Objections to R&R due by 8/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Report and Recommendation) (sp) |
| Filing 10 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA208408. (fr) |
| Filing 11 Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss Case #7 filed by Petitioner Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami. (sp) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: re: MOTION TO DISMISS #7 . The Court is in receipt of Respondent's "Motion to Dismiss, etc.", filed 6/4/20. Petitioner shall file opposition to the motion within 30 days of the date of this order. At that time, the Court will take the motion under submission without oral argument, unless the Court otherwise orders. Failure to file timely opposition to the motion may result in the denial and dismissal of the Petition. Respondent need not file an Answer to the Petition until further order of this Court. (sp)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #7 (Attachments: #1 Lod 1 (COA Pet).pdf, #2 Lod 2 (IR).pdf, #3 Lod 3 (Reply).pdf, #4 Lod 4 (Order).pdf, #5 Lod 5 (COA Pet 2).pdf, #6 Lod 6 (Order).pdf, #7 Lod 7 (CSC pet).pdf, #8 Lod 8 (docket).pdf)(LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Respondent Pollard. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (LaPietra, Vincent) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Pollard. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Pollard(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Respondent's attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. (sp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Hereby Ordered that Respondent file an Answer to the Petition within 23 days of the date of this Order. All lodged documents must be numbered sequentially. Each lodged document must be stapled or otherwise securely fastened, and must bear the lodgment number and case number on the first page of the document. It is Further Ordered that, if Petitioner desires to file a Reply to the Answer, Petitioner shall do so within 15 days of the date that the Answer is filed. It is Further Ordered that Respondent shall give timely notice of any court proceeding to any person who is a "crime victim" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 3771. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Notice, #3 Election) (sp)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111) (jtil) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami. The Petitioner does not consent. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami. Case assigned to Judge Percy Anderson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami v. Pollard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Harold Henry Ghaemmaghami | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Pollard | |
| Represented By: | Vincent P LaPietra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
