Daniel Ruderman v. Rolls Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC
| Daniel Ruderman |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Rolls Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC |
| 2:2020cv04529 |
| May 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. Adding Brian T. Shippen-Murray as counsel of record for Daniel Ruderman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. (Attorney Brian Tate Shippen-Murray added to party Daniel Ruderman(pty:pla))(Shippen-Murray, Brian) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sepehr Daghighian counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. Adding Sepehr Daghighian as counsel of record for Daniel Ruderman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. (Attorney Sepehr Daghighian added to party Daniel Ruderman(pty:pla))(Daghighian, Sepehr) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Michael H Rosenstein counsel for Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. Adding Michael H. Rosenstein as counsel of record for Daniel Ruderman for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. (Attorney Michael H Rosenstein added to party Daniel Ruderman(pty:pla))(Rosenstein, Michael) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 8/10/2020 at 2pm. (wm)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Jury Demand #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on May 20, 2020. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC.. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC, identifying BMW (US) Holding Corp.. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV14876 Receipt No: ACACDC-26507307 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Andrew K Stefatos added to party Rolls-Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC(pty:dft))(Stefatos, Andrew) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, Rolls Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Daniel Ruderman. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/17/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Rolls Royce Motor Cars NA, LLC. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 5/18/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
