Roman Teroganesyan v. Ferrari North America, Inc. et al
| Roman Teroganesyan |
| Passione Rossa, LLC, Ferrari North America, Inc., Does 1 to 25, inclusive and Passione Rossa, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Ferrari of Beverly Hills |
| 2:2020cv04588 |
| May 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE DUE TO SETTLEMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court has been advised that this action has been settled. Accordingly, it is ordered that the action is dismissed. The Court retains jurisdiction for 60 days to vacate this Order and to reopen the action on a showing of good cause that the settlement has not been completed and further proceedings are necessary.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Defendants Ferrari North America, Inc. and Passione Rossa, LLC dba Ferrari of Beverly Hills Ferrari North America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order re Joint Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice)(Stuhlbarg, Richard) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 1/19/21. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 10
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/15/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial set for 4/13/2021 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The Court takes the Scheduling Conference off calendar and establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-4 days, filed by Defendants Ferrari North America, Inc., Passione Rossa, LLC.. (Mohrman, Hannah) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2020 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (esa) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ferrari North America, Inc., Ferrari of Beverly Hills. (Mohrman, Hannah) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Ferrari North America, Inc., Ferrari of Beverly Hills, (Mohrman, Hannah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV14595 Receipt No: ACACDC-26525776 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Ferrari North America, Inc., Ferrari of Beverly Hills. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Hannah L. Mohrman) (Attorney Hannah Lee Mohrman added to party Ferrari North America, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Hannah Lee Mohrman added to party Ferrari of Beverly Hills(pty:dft))(Mohrman, Hannah) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Ferrari North America, Inc., Passione Rossa, LLC, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Roman Teroganesyan. (filed in state court 4/15/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 7) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendant Ferrari North America, Inc. (filed in state court 5/5/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 73)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendant Passione Rossa, LLC. (filed in state court 5/20/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 80)(esa) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Roman Teroganesyan, upon Defendant Ferrari North America, Inc. served on 4/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 5) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
