Gabriela Rosario v. 11343 Penrose Inc., et al
| GABRIELA ROSARIO |
| CHAVIRA CINDY, Doe Managers 1-3, 11343 PENROSE INC. dba LA VIDA GENTLEMENS CLUB, Doe Managers, Cindy Chavira, Does 4-10, inclusive and 11343 Penrose Inc. doing business as La Vida Gentlemens Club |
| Does 4-10 |
| 2:2020cv04715 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| John F Walter |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 206 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Cindy Chavira answer now due 8/6/2020, filed by Defendant Cindy Chavira.(Attorney Ernest J Franceschi, Jr added to party Cindy Chavira (pty:dft))(Franceschi, Ernest)
|
|
Filing 14
First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 11343 Penrose Inc. answer now due 8/6/2020, filed by Defendant 11343 Penrose Inc..(Attorney Ernest J Franceschi, Jr added to party 11343 Penrose Inc.(pty:dft))(Franceschi, Ernest)
|
|
Filing 13
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gabriela Rosario, upon Defendant 11343 Penrose Inc. served on 6/12/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process Cindy Chavira in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 12
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Gabriela Rosario, upon Defendant Cindy Chavira served on 6/12/2020, answer due 7/6/2020. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION of John P. Kristensen Lead Trial Counsel Re: Compliance With Local Rules Governing Electronic Filing filed by Plaintiff Gabriela Rosario. (Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. [See Order for details.] (et)
|
|
Filing 9
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant 11343 Penrose Inc. (car)
|
|
Filing 8
21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Cindy Chavira. (car)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car)
|
|
Filing 5
Certification and Notice of Interested Parties of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff GABRIELA ROSARIO, (Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 4
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff GABRIELA ROSARIO. (Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff GABRIELA ROSARIO. (Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff GABRIELA ROSARIO. (Kristensen, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26585071 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff GABRIELA ROSARIO. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form For Wage Claim for Gabriela Rosario) (Attorney John P Kristensen added to party GABRIELA ROSARIO(pty:pla))(Kristensen, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
