Mitchel Zohner v. City of Torrance et al
| MITCHEL ZOHNER |
| MARK PITTMAN, BRANDEN NAKASHIMA, CITY OF TORRANCE, a public entity, DAVID CHANDLER, City of Torrance and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv04719 |
| May 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER RE JURY TRIAL by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Last Day to Add Parties/Amend Pleadings 12/21/2020. Non-expert Discovery Cut-off 2/22/2021. Last Day to Hear Motions 3/22/2021. File Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit and Witness Lists, Status Report regarding settlement, and all Motions in Limine 5/17/2021. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 6/7/2021 at 11:00 AM. Trial Date (Est. 4 to 6 Days) set for 6/29/2021 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 3/1/2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 17 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to the Central District of California's Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP), the Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for 7/27/2020 at 11:00am. No appearances shall be made. The Court will review the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and issue pretrial and trial dates by separate order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (smom) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 16 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Report filed by Plaintiff Mitchel Zohner.. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference 07/27/20 at 11:00 AM (pg)
|
| Filing 14 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant David Chandler, City of Torrance, Branden Nakashima, Mark Pittman, (Thompson-Bell, Della) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant David Chandler, City of Torrance, Branden Nakashima, Mark Pittman.(Attorney Della D Thompson-Bell added to party David Chandler(pty:dft), Attorney Della D Thompson-Bell added to party City of Torrance(pty:dft), Attorney Della D Thompson-Bell added to party Branden Nakashima(pty:dft), Attorney Della D Thompson-Bell added to party Mark Pittman(pty:dft))(Thompson-Bell, Della) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mitchel Zohner, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sandra McJannett - Admin. Assistant - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mitchel Zohner, upon Defendant City of Torrance served on 6/3/2020, answer due 6/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marlene Hansen - Office Assistant to City Clerk - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mitchel Zohner, upon Defendant Mark Pittman served on 6/3/2020, answer due 6/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sandra McJannett - Admin. Assistant - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mitchel Zohner, upon Defendant Branden Nakashima served on 6/3/2020, answer due 6/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sandra McJannett - Admin. Assistant - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mitchel Zohner, upon Defendant David Chandler served on 6/3/2020, answer due 6/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sandra McJannett - Admin. Assistant - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants David Chandler, City of Torrance, Branden Nakashima, Mark Pittman. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MITCHEL ZOHNER. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MITCHEL ZOHNER, (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MITCHEL ZOHNER. (Pruitt, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26586235 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff MITCHEL ZOHNER. (Attorney Andrew S Pruitt added to party MITCHEL ZOHNER(pty:pla))(Pruitt, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
