Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Company
| Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc. and Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. |
| Continental Casualty Company |
| 2:2020cv04799 |
| May 29, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:20-cv-04799 MWF(AGRx). (rn) |
| Filing 11 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Defendant Continental Casualty Company. The Defendant does not consent. (Christensen, Robert) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Continental Casualty Company answer now due 7/29/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Continental Casualty Company.(Attorney Robert C Christensen added to party Continental Casualty Company(pty:dft))(Christensen, Robert) |
| Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc., upon Defendant Continental Casualty Company served on 6/8/2020, answer due 6/29/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Registered Agent, by Serving Carlos Paz, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Wallan, Robert) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Continental Casualty Company. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc. identifying FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Wallan, Robert) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc., (Wallan, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.. (Wallan, Robert) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.. (Wallan, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26616348 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.. (Attorney Robert L Wallan added to party Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.(pty:pla))(Wallan, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
