I.M. v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., et al
Plaintiff: I. M. and Izabella Macias
Defendant: Does 1-30, in their individual capacities, Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., Does and 12-30, in their individual capacities, J. S., C. F., G. D., Josue Blocus, Timothy Seberig, Masnick Fortunat, Myriam Edouard, Frank Daddabbo, Quentin Browne, Sheryl Blocus, Giuliano Daddabbo and Austin Harper
Case Number: 2:2020cv04817
Filed: May 29, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
2 Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 152 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS #151 . The court GRANTS the stipulating parties, Plaintiff I.M. and Defendants Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., Frank Daddabo, and G.D's. request and DISMISSES the action with prejudice, with each side to bear her, his, or its own attorney's fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) Modified on 7/5/2022 (lc).
June 29, 2022 Filing 151 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Izabella Macias. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Naylor, Charles)
March 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS [DKT. 149] by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The court GRANTS the Stipulation #149 and ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Josue Blocus, Sheryl Blocus, Quentin Browne, Myriam Edouard, Masnick Fortunat, and C.F., a minor, are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Each of these parties is to bear his or her own attorney's fees and costs. (lom)
March 24, 2022 Filing 149 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendants Josue Blocus, Sheryl Blocus, Quentin Browne, Myriam Edouard, C. F., Masnick Fortunat filed by Plaintiff Izabella Macias. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Naylor, Charles)
March 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 148 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION (DKT. #147 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court STRIKES the parties' STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL for failure to attest on the signature page of the document that all other signatories listed, who electronically signed with a "s" and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the content of and have authorized the filing. See Local Rule 5-4.3.4. Any renewed stipulation must comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules. Failure to comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules in any renewed stipulation, including Local Rule 5-4.3.4, may result in the denial of the stipulation with prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 17, 2022 Filing 147 [STRICKEN PER COURT ORDER AT DOCKET 148] Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendants Josue Blocus, Sheryl Blocus, Quentin Browne, Myriam Edouard, C. F., Masnick Fortunat filed by Plaintiff Izabella Macias. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Naylor, Charles) Modified on 3/21/2022 (tf).
December 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMOVE AND REPLACE GUARDIAN AD LITEM ALEJANDRO MACIAS by #144 Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: 1. ALEJANDRO MACIAS may withdraw as guardian ad litem for petitioner I.M. and be removed as Guardian Ad Litem in this matter; 2. I.M. may act as her own person for purposes of this litigation; and, 3. Petitioners true name, Izabella Macias, is substituted in place and instead of her initials, I.M. (lc)
November 29, 2021 Filing 145 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document, #144 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulation: order. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
November 24, 2021 Filing 144 STIPULATION TO REMOVE AND REPLACE GUARDIAN AD LITEM ALEJANDRO MACIAS; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Alejandro Macias' Request to Withdraw as Guardian Ad Litem, #2 Exhibit B - Statement of "I.M.", #3 Proposed Order re Stipulation to Remove and Replace Guardian Ad Litem Alejandro Macias)(Naylor, Charles)
November 24, 2021 Filing 143 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Report #141 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Other error(s) with document(s): This filing was in response to court's response deficiency notice. Pdf is entitled "amended" with correct case number. However was filed under incorrect event again and texted over to read as amended joint report of rule 26(f. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
November 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 142 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court VACATES the scheduling conference set for December 3, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The parties shall adhere to the dates previously set in the court's order granting the stipulation to continue trial and related dates (Dkt. #120 ). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf)
November 23, 2021 Filing 141 AMENDED JOINT REPORT of RULE 26(f) filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
November 23, 2021 Filing 140 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Report #137 ( "Second Updated" Joint Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan) by Plaintiff by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by forthwith. The case number is incorrect or missing. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Incorrect Judge's initials of previous Judge as "GW" on case number. Case reassigned 12/29/20 to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case number is to read correctly as 2:20-cv-04817-FLA (MRWx). (lc)
November 22, 2021 Filing 139 CORRECTED #138 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Report #137 by Plaintiff. The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Incorrect Judge's initials of previous Judge as "GW" on case number. Case reassigned 12/29/20 to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case number is to read correctly as: 2:20-cv-4817 FLA (MRWx).In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
November 22, 2021 Filing 138 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Report #137 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Incorrect Judge's initials of previous Judge as "GW" on case number. Case reassigned 12/29/20 to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case number is to read correctly as: 2:20-cv-4817 FLA (MRWx) In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
November 19, 2021 Filing 137 JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT REPORT of RULE 26(f) filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
November 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2021 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (jre)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ALLOW ANSWERS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO SERVE AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT #134 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The following Defendants' respective answers to the First Amended Complaint shall serve as answers to the Second Amended Complaint: Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.; C.F., a minor; G.D., a minor; Josue Blocus; Masnick Fortunat; Myriam Edouard; Frank Daddabbo; Quentin Browne; and Sheryl Blocus. (lc)
August 12, 2021 Filing 134 STIPULATION for Order allow answers to first amended complaint to serve as answer to second amended complaint filed by Defendant Myriam Edouard. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO ALLOW ANSWERS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO SERVE AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Dowling, Thomas)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 133 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO ALLOW ANSWERS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO SERVE AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. #130 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Court STRIKES the parties Joint Stipulated Motion to Allow Answers to First Amended Complaint to Serve as Answer to Second Amended Complaint for failure to email a Microsoft Word copy of the proposed order, along with a PDF copy of the electronically filed stipulation to the judge's generic email address at FLA_Chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. See Local Rule 5-4.4.2. Any renewed stipulation must comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv)
August 6, 2021 Filing 132 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #127 filed by Defendant Sheryl Blocus.(Beer, Thomas)
August 2, 2021 Filing 131 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition, #130 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulation - Order. Other error(s) with document(s): Also, this is the Western Division. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom)
July 29, 2021 Filing 130 [STRICKEN REFER TO DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER 130][JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO ALLOW ANSWERS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO SERVE AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed as] Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant I. M. amending Amended Complaint/Petition #127 , filed by Defendant Myriam Edouard (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO ALLOW ANSWERS TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO SERVE AS ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Dowling, Thomas) Modified on 7/30/2021 (lom). Modified on 8/10/2021 (vv).
July 26, 2021 Filing 129 21 DAY Summons Issued re Second Amended Complaint #127 as to defendant Austin Harper. (lom)
July 23, 2021 Filing 128 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #127 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
July 23, 2021 Filing 127 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint/Petition #28 , Amended Complaint/Petition #121 , filed by Plaintiff I. M.(Naylor, Charles)
July 23, 2021 Filing 126 NOTICE OF ERRATA RE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCUMENT #121) AND REQUEST FOR SUMMONS (DOCUMENT #122) filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 125 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENT by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Court hereby STRIKES the Second Amended Complaint #121 . The caption is incomplete. (REFER TO DOCKET ENTRY #123 ). Counsel is instructed to file a Corrected Second Amended Complaint no later July 23, 2021. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv)
July 22, 2021 Filing 124 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request re second amended complaint #122 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Clerk issued deficiency on corresponding incomplete caption of the second amended complaint to which this summons was to be issued. see docket no. 123. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lc)
July 22, 2021 Filing 123 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Request #122 , Second Amended Complaint/Petition #121 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of document is incomplete/incorrect. FRCP 10...Caption incomplete (reads identical to first amended complaint caption); Clerk found caption error due to what appears to be new defendant as Named " AUSTIN HARPER, formerly identified as "DOE 5". Filer failed to make changes in the caption accordingly on both the initiating pleading and the summons request. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) Modified on 7/22/2021 (lc).
July 21, 2021 Filing 122 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #121 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
July 20, 2021 Filing 121 [STRICKEN REFER TO DOCKET ENTRY 125] SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint/Petition #28 , filed by Plaintiff I. M.(Naylor, Charles) Modified on 7/22/2021 (vv).
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE DATE, POST-MEDIATION STATUS CONFERENCE AND RELATED DISCOVERY, MOTION, AND MOTION CUT-OFF DATES 1116 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/26/2022 03:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 9/6/2022 08:30 AM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS ORDER #115 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 118 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION of defendant Timothy Seberig in PRO SE in place and instead of Attorney George Kelly (deceased) re filing of withdrawal by James M. Hodges, practice administrator of Law Office of George Kelly #114 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha (lc)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 117 ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE Defendant J.S. by guardian ad litem Timothy Seberig in PRO SE in place of ATTORNEY George T. Kelly as counsel of record for Defendant J.S. by guardian ad litem Timothy Seberig (SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER SPECIFICS) #113 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha (lc)
July 9, 2021 Filing 116 STIPULATION to Continue JOINT STIPULATED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE, FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE DATE, POST-MEDIATION STATUS CONFERENCE AND RELATED DISCOVERY, MOTION AND MOTION CUT-OFF DATEST-OFF DATES filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Aksana M. Coone, #2 Proposed Order)(Naylor, Charles)
July 9, 2021 Filing 115 Joint STIPULATION for Leave to STIPULATED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Naylor, Charles)
July 7, 2021 Filing 114 First REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY George T. Kelly as counsel of record Filed by Defendant J.S. and Timothy Seberig filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Request to Withdraw) (Kelly, George)
July 7, 2021 Filing 113 First REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ATTORNEY George T. Kelly as counsel of record Filed by Defendant J.S. and Timothy Seberig filed by Defendant J. S., Timothy Seberig. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Request to Withdraw) (Kelly, George)
July 1, 2021 Filing 112 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) #111 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak)
June 30, 2021 Filing 111 NOTICE filed by Defendant J. S., Timothy Seberig. Notice of Appointment of Attorney James Hodges as Practice Administrator of the Law Office of George Kelly (Kelly, George)
June 24, 2021 Filing 110 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #108 , Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #107 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken (lc)
June 23, 2021 Filing 109 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #108 , Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #107 re Timothy Seberig in Pro Per for himself and for J.S. by his GAL Timothy Seberig. The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Other error(s) with document(s): MISSING main document; no stipulation nor Request to substitute attorney form (G-01).. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
June 22, 2021 Filing 108 (STRICKEN PER 6/24/2021 ORDER DOCKET NO. 110). First STIPULATION to Substitute attorney J.S. by his GAL Timothy Seberig in place of attorney George T. Kelly and Gabriella Guthner filed by Defendant J. S..(Kelly, George) Modified on 6/24/2021 (lc).
June 22, 2021 Filing 107 (STRICKEN PER 6/24/2021 ORDER DOCKET NO. 110). First STIPULATION to Substitute attorney Timothy Seberig, Pro Per in place of attorney George T. Kelly and Gabriella Guthner filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig.(Kelly, George) Modified on 6/24/2021 (lc).
May 12, 2021 Filing 106 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Amanda Grace Almeda counsel for Defendant Sheryl Blocus. Adding Amanda Almeda as counsel of record for Sheryl Blocus for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Sheryl Blocus. (Attorney Amanda Grace Almeda added to party Sheryl Blocus(pty:dft))(Almeda, Amanda)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, AND CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (rrey)
April 16, 2021 Filing 104 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant J. S., Timothy Seberig, (Kelly, George)
April 15, 2021 Filing 103 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Quentin Browne served on 1/13/2021, answer due 2/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Quentin Browne in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 15, 2021 Filing 102 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Myriam Edouard served on 1/17/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon c/o Masnick Fortunat in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 15, 2021 Filing 101 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Masnick Fortunat served on 1/17/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Masnick Fortunat in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 15, 2021 Filing 100 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Josue Blocus served on 1/13/2021, answer due 2/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon c/o Sheryl Blocus in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 15, 2021 Filing 99 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant G. D. served on 1/13/2021, answer due 2/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon C/O SUSAN HANSON in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 15, 2021 Filing 98 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Frank Daddabbo served on 1/15/2021, answer due 2/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon FRANK DADDABBO in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 14, 2021 Filing 97 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant C. F. served on 1/17/2021, answer due 2/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon c/o Masnick Fortunat in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Naylor, Charles)
April 13, 2021 Filing 96 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS #94 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The Proofs of Service #86 , #87 , #88 , #89 , #90 , #91 and #92 filed on April 9, 2021 are stricken. (vv)
April 13, 2021 Filing 95 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #93 by J.S. and Timothy Seberig. The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Other error(s) with document(s): Case number Missing Official Judge and Magistrate initials. Refer to 12/29/20 order of reassignment. Correct case number is to read as: 2:20-cv-4817 FLA (MRWx). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
April 13, 2021 Filing 94 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #89 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #88 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #92 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #90 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #91 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #86 , Proof of Service (subsequent documents) #87 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of summons and complaint returned executed 21 days. Due to incorrect event, docket entries incomplete and MISSING REQUIRED Information re service of process as to who, when and how service of summons and complaint were made Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
April 9, 2021 Filing 93 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 Filed by Defendant J.S. and Timothy Seberig filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig.(Kelly, George)
April 9, 2021 Filing 92 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF I. M., served on 1/13/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 9, 2021 Filing 91 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF I. M., served on 1/17/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 9, 2021 Filing 90 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF I. M., served on 1/17/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 9, 2021 Filing 89 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF I. M., served on 1/13/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 9, 2021 Filing 88 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF I. M., served on 1/4/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 9, 2021 Filing 87 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PL I. M., served on 1/13/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 9, 2021 Filing 86 ***STRICKEN REFER TO DOCUMENT NUMBER 96***PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF I. M., served on 1/4/2021. (Naylor, Charles) Modified on 4/13/2021 (vv).
April 7, 2021 Filing 85 NOTICE filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig. (Kelly, George)
April 6, 2021 Filing 84 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #82 , REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #83 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Erroneously set for 4/7/21 1:30 PM hearing on Judges' calendar. Such hearing does NOT appear on the document, NOR is a hearing required on the IFP request format. Clerk has TERMED ONLY erroneous hearing, both Request remain PENDING the Judge's ruling. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
April 5, 2021 Filing 83 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant J. S.. Request set for hearing on 4/7/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attorney George T Kelly added to party J. S.(pty:dft)) (Kelly, George)
April 5, 2021 Filing 82 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig. Request set for hearing on 4/7/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attorney George T Kelly added to party Timothy Seberig(pty:dft)) (Kelly, George)
April 1, 2021 Filing 81 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #80 , Miscellaneous Document #79 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Request: Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV60). Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
April 1, 2021 Filing 80 Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig (Kelly, George)
April 1, 2021 Filing 79 Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig (Kelly, George)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER RE PETITION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The petition for an order appointing TIMOTHY SEBERIG, as the Guardian Ad Litem of J.S., is GRANTED. re Miscellaneous Document #77 (vm)
March 23, 2021 Filing 77 Petition for Guardian Ad Litem filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order for Appointment of GAL)(Kelly, George)
March 23, 2021 Filing 76 Petition for Guardian Ad Litem filed by Defendant Timothy Seberig (Kelly, George)
March 5, 2021 Filing 75 NOTICE of Interest Parties filed by Defendant Josue Blocus. (Cox, John)
March 4, 2021 Filing 74 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE OF FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: In accordance with the Notice of Filer of Deficiencies in Electronically Filed Documents, regarding Defendant Josue Blocus' Answer to First Amended Complaint #73 , counsel is ordered to file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than noon on March 5, 2021. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 4, 2021 Filing 73 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #72 by Josue Blocus. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
March 3, 2021 Filing 72 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Josue Blocus.(Attorney John C Cox added to party Josue Blocus(pty:dft))(Cox, John)
March 2, 2021 Filing 71 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Marc S Shapiro counsel for Defendant Frank Daddabbo. Christopher G. Kerr is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Frank Daddabbo. (Shapiro, Marc)
March 2, 2021 Filing 70 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Sheryl Blocus served on 1/13/2021, answer due 2/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon c/o Sheryl Blocus in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Naylor, Charles)
March 1, 2021 Filing 69 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Marc S Shapiro counsel for Defendant Frank Daddabbo. Adding Marc S. Shapiro as counsel of record for Frank Daddabbo for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Frank Daddabbo. (Attorney Marc S Shapiro added to party Frank Daddabbo(pty:dft))(Shapiro, Marc)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 68 INITIAL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (rrey)
February 22, 2021 Filing 67 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Quentin Browne, (Bereny, Joshua)
February 22, 2021 Filing 66 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Quentin Browne.(Attorney Joshua Bereny added to party Quentin Browne(pty:dft))(Bereny, Joshua)
February 22, 2021 Filing 65 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint, #60 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #61 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #62 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Other error(s) with document(s): The Certificate of interested party should have been e-filed under its own specific event, instead of being submitted as an attachment. Incorrect Judge's initials as "FKA".. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
February 22, 2021 Filing 64 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Sheryl Blocus, (Beer, Thomas)
February 22, 2021 Filing 63 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Defendant Sheryl Blocus.(Beer, Thomas)
February 19, 2021 Filing 62 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND Answer filed by Defendant Frank Daddabbo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Certification of interested parties)(Kerr, Christopher)
February 19, 2021 Filing 61 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND Answer filed by Defendant Giuliano Daddabbo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Certification of interested parties)(Attorney Christopher Gordon Kerr added to party Giuliano Daddabbo(pty:dft))(Kerr, Christopher)
February 19, 2021 Filing 60 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 JURY DEMAND. Answer filed by Defendant Frank Daddabbo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Certification of interested parties)(Attorney Christopher Gordon Kerr added to party Frank Daddabbo(pty:dft))(Kerr, Christopher)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner: granting #56 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem, appointing Masnick Fortunat as Guardian ad Litem for C.F. (hr)
February 10, 2021 Filing 58 Notice of Electronic Filing re Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #54 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #52 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #53 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #55 , Order Extending Answer Due Deadline, #57 , PETITION for Appointment of Masnick Fortunat as Guardian ad Litem for C.F. #56 , Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #51 e-mailed to Thomas Beer bounced due to 5.1.2 - Bad destination host. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (lmh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TO FEBRUARY 19, 2021 AS TO Defendants Frank Daddabbo and Giulian Daddabo (erroneously sued and served as G.D., a minor) #51 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha (lc)
February 9, 2021 Filing 56 PETITION for Appointment of Masnick Fortunat as Guardian ad Litem for C.F. filed by defendant Masnick Fortunat. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order RE PETITION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM) (Dowling, Thomas)
February 9, 2021 Filing 55 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Myriam Edouard, (Dowling, Thomas)
February 9, 2021 Filing 54 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Myriam Edouard.(Attorney Thomas J Dowling added to party Myriam Edouard(pty:dft))(Dowling, Thomas)
February 9, 2021 Filing 53 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND OF DEFENDANT C.F., A MINOR, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, MASNICK FORTUNAT filed by defendant Masnick Fortunat.(Dowling, Thomas)
February 9, 2021 Filing 52 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendant Masnick Fortunat.(Attorney Thomas J Dowling added to party Masnick Fortunat(pty:dft))(Dowling, Thomas)
February 8, 2021 Filing 51 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Quentin Browne answer now due 2/22/2021; Josue Blocus answer now due 2/22/2021; Sheryl Blocus answer now due 2/22/2021, re Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Defendant Quentin Browne; Josue Blocus; Sheryl Blocus.(Attorney Thomas R Beer added to party Josue Blocus(pty:dft), Attorney Thomas R Beer added to party Sheryl Blocus(pty:dft), Attorney Thomas R Beer added to party Quentin Browne(pty:dft))(Beer, Thomas)
February 5, 2021 Filing 50 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Frank Daddabbo answer now due 5/29/2020; G. D. answer now due 5/29/2020, filed by Defendant Frank Daddabbo; G. D.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order re Stipulation for Order Extending Time for Pleading)(Kerr, Christopher)
January 15, 2021 Filing 49 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd..(Senior, Teresa)
January 4, 2021 Filing 48 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Sheryl Blocus. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 47 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Quentin Browne. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 46 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Frank Daddabbo. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 45 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Myriam Edouard. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 44 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Masnick Fortunat. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 43 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Timothy Seberig. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 42 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant Josue Blocus. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 41 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant G. D. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 40 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant C. F. (lc)
January 4, 2021 Filing 39 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #28 as to defendant J. S. (lc)F
December 31, 2020 Filing 38 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 37 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 36 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 35 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 34 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 33 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 32 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 31 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 30 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 29 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #28 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
December 31, 2020 Filing 28 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff I. M.(Naylor, Charles)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-194) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, this case is transferred from Judge George H. Wu to the calendar of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-4817 FLA (MRWx). (mrgo)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #24 by Judge George H. Wu. The Court hereby orders that Plaintiff is given leave to file a First Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
December 18, 2020 Filing 25 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Stipulation for Leave #24 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Naylor, Charles)
December 18, 2020 Filing 24 STIPULATION for Leave to FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Naylor, Charles)
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the parties. As per C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15, the December 3, 2020, scheduling conference date is taken off calendar. The Court sets the following dates: (Amended Pleadings due by 12/18/2020. Discovery cut-off 8/27/2021. Motion hearing cutoff 11/1/2021. Jury Trial set for 12/14/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Pretrial Conference set for 12/2/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Post-Mediation Status Conference set for 9/16/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (See document for details) (mrgo)
November 30, 2020 Filing 22 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Updated ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff I. M... (Coone, Aksana)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu: granting #19 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue. The deadlines and hearings originally scheduled have been rescheduled. Scheduling Conference reset for 12/3/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (mrgo)
August 20, 2020 Filing 20 JOINT REPORT of RULE 26(f) filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
August 20, 2020 Filing 19 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Scheduling Conference from September 3, 2020 to December 3, 2020 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (Proposed) Order Continuing Scheduling Conference) (Naylor, Charles)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTES ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for September 3, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than August 20, 2020. See Local Rule 26-1. (et)
July 22, 2020 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd..(Senior, Teresa)
July 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AND SERVE ITS RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT BY TWO WEEKS #12 by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the last day for Defendant Princess to file its response to the Plaintiff's Complaint herein is extended to July 22, 2020. (et)
July 8, 2020 Filing 15 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., identifying Carnival Corporation is Parent Company for Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. (Senior, Teresa)
July 8, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jeffrey B Maltzman on behalf of Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. (Attorney Jeffrey B Maltzman added to party Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Maltzman, Jeffrey)
July 7, 2020 Filing 13 PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.S EX PARTE APPLICATION in opposition re: First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 7/22/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #12 filed by Plaintiff I. M.. (Naylor, Charles)
July 6, 2020 Filing 12 First EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 7/22/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF TERESA C. SENIOR IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AND SERVE ITS RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT BY TWO WEEKS, #2 Proposed Order ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE AND SERVE ITS RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT BY TWO WEEKS) (Attorney Teresa Robin Senior added to party Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.(pty:dft)) (Senior, Teresa)
June 17, 2020 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff I. M., upon Defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. served on 6/17/2020, answer due 7/8/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum at CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process for Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by method of service not specified.Original Summons returned. (Coone, Aksana)
June 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
June 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE PETITION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The petition for an order appointing ALEJANDRO MACIAS, as the guardian a litem of I.M., is GRANTED. #5 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. (vm)
May 29, 2020 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd. (esa)
May 29, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
May 29, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa)
May 29, 2020 Filing 5 PETITION for Appointment of Alejandro Macias as Guardian ad Litem for I.M. filed by Plaintiff I.M.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Naylor, Charles)
May 29, 2020 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff I.M., (Naylor, Charles)
May 29, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff I.M.. (Naylor, Charles)
May 29, 2020 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff I.M.. (Naylor, Charles)
May 29, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26619630 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff I.M.. (Attorney Charles D Naylor added to party I.M.(pty:pla))(Naylor, Charles)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: I.M. v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: I. M.
Represented By: Aksana Moshaiv Coone
Represented By: Charles D Naylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Izabella Macias
Represented By: Aksana Moshaiv Coone
Represented By: Charles D Naylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-30, in their individual capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.
Represented By: Teresa Robin Senior
Represented By: Jeffrey B Maltzman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does and 12-30, in their individual capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. S.
Represented By: James M Hodges
Represented By: George T Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. F.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. D.
Represented By: Nicholas S Walls
Represented By: Marc S Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Josue Blocus
Represented By: John C Cox
Represented By: Thomas R. Beer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Seberig
Represented By: James M Hodges
Represented By: George T Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Masnick Fortunat
Represented By: Thomas J Dowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Myriam Edouard
Represented By: Thomas J Dowling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Daddabbo
Represented By: Nicholas S Walls
Represented By: Christopher Gordon Kerr
Represented By: Marc S Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quentin Browne
Represented By: Joshua Bereny
Represented By: Thomas R. Beer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheryl Blocus
Represented By: Amanda Grace Almeda
Represented By: Thomas R. Beer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Giuliano Daddabbo
Represented By: Christopher Gordon Kerr
Represented By: Nicholas S Walls
Represented By: Marc S Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Austin Harper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?