Jin Lee v. Solo Source, Inc. et al
| JIN LEE |
| SOLO SOURCE, INC., CAL WORLD EL MONTE, LLC, SOLO SOURCE, INC. doing business as E @ CUP, Solo Source, Inc. doing business as E Cup and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2020cv04860 |
| June 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Jin Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court ordered Plaintiff to respond to the Order to Show Cause no later than June 16, 2020. As of today's date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to the Court's Order. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled #11 . The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. The parties may contact the deputy clerk of the court to calendar the appearance. If the parties do not dismiss the action or do not place the settlement on the record, thematter will remain on the Court's active trial calendar with all pretrial and trial dates in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Jin Lee. (Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than June 16, 2020. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (et)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson. [See Order for details.] (et)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (tj) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Cal World El Monte, LLC, Solo Source, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JIN LEE. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JIN LEE. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26637540 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JIN LEE(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
