Matthew Pristave v. Ford Motor Company
| Matthew Pristave |
| Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2020cv04892 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Stanley Blumenfeld |
| Charles F Eick |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE #25 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court hereby orders as follows: The parties have stipulated that the action should be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the entire action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (lom)
|
|
Filing 25
Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to case settled filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 24
JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: An offer of judgment having been made and accepted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, and the offer and notice of acceptance having been filed on 11/3/2020 (the "Offer of Judgment") #23 , judgment is hereby entered for Plaintiff Matthew Pristave and against Defendant Ford Motor Company according to the terms set forth in the Offer of Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Settlement Acceptance of Rule 68 Offer filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-147) approved by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr., this case is transferred from Judge Andre Birotte Jr to the calendar of Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-04892 SB(Ex). (rn)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTES [In Chambers] Order DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (Dkt. No. #10 ) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, as Defendant has met its burden by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00 for federal jurisdiction to vest. (lom)
|
|
Filing 20
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT #10 UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motion and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matter can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion, noticed for hearing on August 14, 2020, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER RE: JURY/COURT TRIAL: I. SCHEDULE; II. TRIAL PREPARATION; III. CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Jury Trial set for 8/31/2021 08:30 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions In Limine set for 8/13/2021 11:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Last Date to Hear Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties 7/31/2020. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 4/16/2021. Last Date to Hear Motions 5/21/2021. Deadline to Complete Settlement Conference 6/4/2021. Trial Filings (first round): Motions In Limine, Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law, Witness Lists, Joint Exhibit List, Joint Status Report Regarding Settlement due by 7/23/2021. Trial Filings (second round): Oppositions to Motions In Limine, Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order due by 7/30/2021. See document for further details. (gk)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Rachel F. Kashani on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Attorney Rachel F. Kashani added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Kashani, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 6/4/2021. (cb)
|
|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties, and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the August 7, 2020, Scheduling Conference. Order re Jury/Court Trial to issue. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 15 REPLY in Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff Matthew Pristave. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Attachments: #1 Schedule A)(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 Opposition 10 re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Matthew Pristave. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Matthew Pristave. Motion set for hearing on 8/14/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Barry, David) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 8/7/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company in Los Angeles Superior Court on 5/29/2020, attached as Exhibit C.(jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Matthew Pristave in Los Angeles Superior Court on 4/27/2020, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 20STCV15885 Receipt No: ACACDC-26652854 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
