In Re: Gary E. Moll
| Gary Salzman |
| Gary E. Moll |
| Lisa Watson |
| 2:2020cv04966 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
MINUTES (In Chambers) ORDER DENYING Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2 ) by Judge Josephine L. Staton: The Court DENIES Appellants Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 2.) The Clerk shall transfer this appeal the BAP for further proceedings. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING MOTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR LIMITED PURPOSE OF RULING ON MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915 by William J. Lafferty, Bankruptcy Judge. (car)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Gary Salzman. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Appeal) (car) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF BANKRUPTCY MATTER: Re: Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis entered on 4/22/2020 by Bankruptcy Judge William J. Lafferty, received and assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:15-bk-28182-RK, Adversary number: 2:16-ap-01057-RK, BAP case number: CC-20-1002. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
