Miguel Hernandez v. Tae Young Kim et al
| Miguel Hernandez |
| Tae Young Kim and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2020cv04974 |
| June 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation #15 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the action is dismissed with prejudice, in its entirety. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. (gk)
|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Miguel Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER AND NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES by Judge Dolly M. Gee: In light of Plaintiff's notice of settlement, indicating that the case has settled in its entirety #13 , this action is placed in inactive status. By 10/5/2020, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal of the action or judgment, or (2) a motion to reopen if settlement has not been consummated. Upon the failure to timely comply with this Order, this action shall be deemed dismissed as of 10/6/2020. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. All scheduled dates and deadlines are hereby VACATED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Miguel Hernandez. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 12 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/4/2020. Scheduling Conference set for 9/18/2020 at 9:30 a.m (See order for details.) (kti) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Tae Young Kim.(Attorney Calvin Jukyung Park added to party Tae Young Kim(pty:dft))(Park, Calvin) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Tae Young Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 MIGUEL HERNANDEZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MIGUEL HERNANDEZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26690859 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MIGUEL HERNANDEZ(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
