Kamila Hubacki v. Classic Brands LLC, et al
| Kamila Hubacki |
| Classic Brands LLC, AMAZON.COM, INC, DOES 1-100, Inclusive, Does 1 to 100, Amazon.com, Inc. and Classic Brands, LLC |
| 2:2020cv05105 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Otis D Wright |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Receipt of remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court on 7/9/20 (lc) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court No. 20STCV15094. (lc) |
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Per Stipulation case is 1.REMANDED to Los Angeles Superior court #9 .2. Plaintiff is bound to seek no more than $75,000 in total, inclusive of interest, fees, and costs, in this litigation from either or all defendants. 3. The parties shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs with respect to removal and subsequent remand of the Action.4. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by plaintiff Kamila Hubacki. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Remanding Case to State Court)(Graff, Beth) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Amazon.com, Inc.. (Hussey, Julie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 3 Civil Cover Sheet should be e-filed separately and in the correct event. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Classic Brands, LLC, Does 1 to 100, filed by Plaintiff Kamila Hubacki. Filed in State Court on 4/20/20 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant AMAZON.COM, INC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on 06/09/2020. (Hussey, Julie) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant AMAZON.COM, INC (Hussey, Julie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV15094 Receipt No: ACACDC-26738817 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant AMAZON.COM, INC. (Attachments: #1 Exh. A, #2 Exh. B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Julie LeMaye Hussey added to party AMAZON.COM, INC(pty:dft))(Hussey, Julie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
