Martin Vogel v. SSK Holdings LLC et al
Plaintiff: Martin Vogel
Defendant: Does 1-10 and SSK Holdings LLC
Case Number: 2:2020cv05129
Filed: June 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2020 Filing 11 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SSK Holdings LLC answer now due 8/17/2020, filed by defendant SSK Holdings LLC.(Kassabian, Raffi)
July 20, 2020 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SSK Holdings LLC answer now due 8/3/2020, filed by Defendant SSK Holdings LLC.(Attorney Sareen Bezdikian added to party SSK Holdings LLC(pty:dft))(Bezdikian, Sareen)
June 29, 2020 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel, upon Defendant SSK Holdings LLC served on 6/29/2020, answer due 7/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Julia drier the person in charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
June 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
June 10, 2020 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant SSK Holdings LLC. (lh)
June 10, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
June 10, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh)
June 9, 2020 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Handy, Russell)
June 9, 2020 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel, (Handy, Russell)
June 9, 2020 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Handy, Russell)
June 9, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26748091 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Martin Vogel. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Martin Vogel(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin Vogel v. SSK Holdings LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SSK Holdings LLC
Represented By: Sareen Bezdikian
Represented By: Raffi Kassabian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Vogel
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?