Jose Estrada v. Smart and Final Stores LLC, et al
| Jose Estrada |
| DOES 1-10, Smart & Final Stores LLC and Smart and Final Stores LLC |
| 2:2020cv05175 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Alka Sagar |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER Extending Defendants' Time to Respond to Initial Complaint to September 5, 2020 (L.R. 8-3) granting Stipulation #15 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the joint request of the parties set forth in the above-referenced Second Stipulation is hereby GRANTED, thereby making September 5, 2020 the new deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint. (bm)
|
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to September 5, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Smart and Final Stores LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reeves, Rex) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael Joseph Karlin on behalf of Defendant Smart and Final Stores LLC (Attorney Michael Joseph Karlin added to party Smart and Final Stores LLC(pty:dft))(Karlin, Michael) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT of Qualified Non-Opposition to relation of cases filed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada (Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Christopher A Seabock on behalf of Plaintiff Jose Estrada (Attorney Christopher A Seabock added to party Jose Estrada(pty:pla))(Seabock, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant Smart and Final Stores LLC. Related Case(s): 2:20-cv-05401-JFW-MRW (Karlin, Michael) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Smart and Final Stores LLC answer now due 8/6/2020, filed by Attorney for Defendant Smart and Final Stores LLC.(Attorney Rex T Reeves added to party Smart and Final Stores LLC(pty:dft))(Reeves, Rex) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada, upon Defendant Smart and Final Stores LLC served on 6/16/2020, answer due 7/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: C T CORPORATION SYSTEM (Albert Damonte, intake specialist) in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Smart and Final Stores LLC. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26764139 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Jose Estrada. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Jose Estrada(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
