Maxlite, Inc. v. ATG Electronics, Inc., et al
| Maxlite, Inc. |
| David Wyatt and ATG Electronics, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv05209 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Autumn D. Spaeth. New Case Number 8:20-cv-01056 JLS (ADSx). (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF MAXLITE, INC., a New Jersey corporation, (Hugo, Edward) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by PLAINTIFF MAXLITE, INC., a New Jersey corporation. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS)(Hugo, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant MAXLITE, INC., a New Jersey corporation. (Hugo, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26777169 - Fee: $400, filed by MAXLITE, INC., a NEW JERSEY CORPORATION MAXLITE, INC., a New Jersey corporation. (Attorney Edward R Hugo added to party MAXLITE, INC., a New Jersey corporation (pty:bkmov))(Hugo, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
