Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited v. The HYV, LLC et al
Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited |
Bryant Ortega, The HYV, LLC and Bryant Chase Ortega |
2:2020cv05269 |
June 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Michael R Wilner |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant The HYV, LLC (Meiselas, Benjamin) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Bryant Chase Ortega, (Meiselas, Benjamin) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The HYV, LLC, (Meiselas, Benjamin) |
Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Bryant Chase Ortega.(Meiselas, Benjamin) |
Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The HYV, LLC.(Meiselas, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jre) |
|
Filing 16 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 7/28/20. ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Bryant Chase Ortega, The HYV, LLC.(Meiselas, Benjamin) Modified on 7/29/2020 (bm). |
|
Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Attachment 1: Proposed Order #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Caption of document is incomplete/incorrect. Other error(s) with document(s): Caption of proposed order is missing. A corrected proposed order can be e-filed by submitting a Notice of Lodging with the separate, additional attachment of the proposed order. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bryant Chase Ortega answer now due 7/20/2020; The HYV, LLC answer now due 7/20/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants Bryant Chase Ortega; The HYV, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Meiselas, Benjamin) |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Benjamin Jared Meiselas counsel for Defendants Bryant Chase Ortega, The HYV, LLC. Adding BENJAMIN J. MEISELAS as counsel of record for THE HYV, LLC and BRYANT "CHASE" ORTEGA for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs THE HYV, LLC and BRYANT "CHASE" ORTEGA. (Attorney Benjamin Jared Meiselas added to party Bryant Chase Ortega(pty:dft), Attorney Benjamin Jared Meiselas added to party The HYV, LLC(pty:dft))(Meiselas, Benjamin) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited, upon Defendant Bryant Chase Ortega served on 6/16/2020, answer due 7/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bryant Chase Ortega, Individually in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (McCloskey, Andrew) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited, upon Defendant The HYV, LLC served on 6/16/2020, answer due 7/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Bryant Ortega, Agent for Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (McCloskey, Andrew) |
|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited, identifying The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. (McCloskey, Andrew) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Bryant Chase Ortega, The HYV, LLC. (car) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (car) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited. (McCloskey, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited. (McCloskey, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26795128 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Andrew R McCloskey added to party Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited(pty:pla))(McCloskey, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.