Ben Coffman v. Marcus R. Flemming et al
| Ben Coffman |
| DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, MARCUS R. FLEMMING d/b/a PSYPHIRE PRODUCTIONS and https://psyphire.com and Marcus R. Flemming doing business as Psyphire Productions doing business as https://psyphire.com |
| 2:2020cv05285 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Marcus R. Flemming. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff Ben Coffman. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Ben Coffman. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Ben Coffman. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ben Coffman. (Higbee, Mathew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-26797855 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Ben Coffman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F) (Attorney Mathew K Higbee added to party Ben Coffman(pty:pla))(Higbee, Mathew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.