Eve Champagne Junn v. South Pasadena Unified School District et al
| Eve Champagne Junn |
| Karen Reed, Julian Espades, South Pasadena Unified School District, Janet Anderson, Francisco Lopez, Anthony Chan, Geoff Yantz and Geoff Yantz, Ed. D. |
| Sidney K Kanazawa |
| 2:2020cv05329 |
| June 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 42
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and cost. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
|
|
Filing 41
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: In light of the Notice of Settlement filed October 27, 2021, the Court sets a hearing on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal for November 29, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. If a stipulated dismissal is filed prior to this date, the matter will be taken off calendar, all pending dates will be vacated and no appearance is needed. (shb)
|
| Filing 40 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 39 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Sidney K Kanazawa: Mediation held on May 19, 2021. The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Kanazawa, Sidney) |
| Filing 38 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Janet Anderson, Anthony Chan, Julian Espades, Francisco Lopez, Karen Reed, Geoff Yantz, Ed. D..(Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party Julian Espades(pty:dft))(Pizarro, Antony) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Sidney K Kanazawa has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst) |
| Filing 36 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Sidney K. Kanazawa may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn(Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 35 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Anthony Chan answer now due 4/12/2021; Geoff Yantz, Ed. D. answer now due 4/12/2021; Francisco Lopez answer now due 4/12/2021; Karen Reed answer now due 4/12/2021; Janet Anderson answer now due 4/12/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Anthony Chan; Geoff Yantz, Ed. D.; Francisco Lopez; Karen Reed; Janet Anderson.(Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party Janet Anderson(pty:dft), Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party Anthony Chan(pty:dft), Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party Francisco Lopez(pty:dft), Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party Karen Reed(pty:dft), Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party Geoff Yantz, Ed. D.(pty:dft))(Pizarro, Antony) |
| Filing 34 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn, upon Defendant Janet Anderson served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021; Anthony Chan served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021; Francisco Lopez served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021; Karen Reed served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021; Geoff Yantz, Ed. D. served on 3/1/2021, answer due 3/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon IRENE BUGARIN, BUSINESS OPERATIONS/AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service, #2 Proof of Service, #3 Proof of Service, #4 Proof of Service)(Hathaway, Mark) |
|
Filing 33
CORRECTED ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. (shb)
|
| Filing 32 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Order/Referral to ADR (No 1) (Judge) (ADR-12) #31 , Scheduling Order, #30 . The correct date for the Jury Trial is: 11/16/21 at 9:00 A.M. - The docket will be correct to reflect such.The ORDER/REFERRAL will be re-docketed to reflect the ADR Procedure is NO. 2. (shb) |
|
Filing 31
[REFER TO NTC OF CLERICAL ERROR, #32 - ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge for Settlement Conference. (shb) Modified on 3/15/2021 (shb).
|
|
Filing 30
REFER TO CLERICAL ERROR, #32 - SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Court issues the following Order: Counsel must agree on the date for the disclosure of expert witness reports pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)2. The agreed-upon disclosure date must precede the discovery cut-off date such that all discovery, including expert depositions, must be completed prior to the discovery cut-off date. All discovery motions must be heard prior to the discovery cut-off date. Amended Pleadings due by 5/7/2021., Discovery cut-off 8/10/2021., Motions due by 9/24/2021., Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2021 11:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson., Jury Trial set for 11/8/2021 11:00 AM before Judge Dean D. Pregerson.) See order for further details. (shb) Modified on 3/15/2021 (shb).
|
| Filing 29 SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26(F) JOINT REPORT filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
|
Filing 28
NOTICE BY TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for hearing September 28, 2020, is hereby VACATED. The Courts Scheduling Order to be issued. No Appearance necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 27 JOINT REPORT of Fed.R.Civ.P.26(f) Conference filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Scheduling Conference set for September 28, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. This matter is set for a scheduling conference in Courtroom 9C, before the Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, located at 350 West 1st Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. The conferencewill be held pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b). Lead trial counsel shall attend the scheduling conference. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #24 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 24 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant South Pasadena Unified School District.(Attorney Antony R Pizarro added to party South Pasadena Unified School District(pty:dft))(Pizarro, Antony) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn, upon Defendant South Pasadena Unified School District acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 7/8/2020, answer due 7/29/2020. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Joshua Kuns, Attorney for Defendant. (Hathaway, Mark) |
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 21 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Karen Reed. (shb) |
| Filing 20 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Julian Espades. (shb) |
| Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Janet Anderson. (shb) |
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Geoff Yantz, Ed. D.. (shb) |
| Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Francisco Lopez. (shb) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Anthony Chan. (shb) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Janet Anderson, Anthony Chan, Julian Espades, Francisco Lopez, Karen Reed, South Pasadena Unified School District, Geoff Yantz, Ed. D.. (shb) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn, identifying Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Hathaway, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 06/15/2020, receipt number ACACDC-26816559), filed by plaintiff Eve Champagne Junn. (Attorney Mark M Hathaway added to party Eve Champagne Junn(pty:pla))(Hathaway, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
