Peninsula Ventures I LLC v. Nano Vision Pte Ltd
Peninsula Ventures I LLC |
Nano Vision PTE LTD and Nano Vision Pte Ltd. |
2:2020cv05332 |
June 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John E McDermott |
Fernando M Olguin |
Other Statutes: Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0009 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC, re Waiver of Service Executed #13 served on July 10, 2020. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page with caption and case number missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC, re Waiver of Service Executed #13 served on July 10, 2020. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC. upon Nano Vision Pte Ltd. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 6/24/2020, answer due 9/22/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Gail E. Papermaster. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 12 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Respondent Nano Vision Pte Ltd c/o Steven Papermaster. (et) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Respondent Nano Vision Pte Ltd c/o Zoltan Papp. (et) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Respondent Nano Vision Pte Ltd. (et) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC, identifying Daniel P. Cannon, Steve Papermaster, Nano Global Corp., Powershift Group LLC. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC. (Brew, Julian) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Confirm Arbitration Award with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 06/15/2020, receipt number 26817346), filed by Petitioner Peninsula Ventures I LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-6 to Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award) (Attorney Julian Brew added to party Peninsula Ventures I LLC(pty:pet))(Brew, Julian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.