William Jones v. Neil McDowell
William Jones |
Neil McDowell |
2:2020cv05361 |
June 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Josephine L Staton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Respondent is GRANTED through September 17, 2020, to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and through October 2, 2020, to file an Answer to the Petition in the alternative. #15 (es) |
Filing 15 Second APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Habeas Corpus Petition; Declaration of Nathan Guttman filed by Respondent Neil McDowell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Guttman, Nathan) |
Filing 14 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order (1) Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 12) (2) Denying Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 13) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: (see document for details.) (es) |
Filing 13 Motion for Extension of Time filed by petitioner William Jones. (es) |
Filing 12 Motion for Appointment of Counsel filed by petitioner William Jones. (es) |
Filing 11 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order Denying Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 10) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. In light of the certificate that Petitioner has average monthly deposits of $120.00 and an average monthly balance in his institutional trust account for the most recent 6-month period of $197.56, Petitioner has not established that he cannot pay the filing fee of $5.00 (28 U.S.C. 1914), which is waived for those qualifying to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Petitioner shall promptly pay the $5.00 fee. (es) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: Respondent is GRANTED through August 18, 2020, to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and through September 2, 2020, to file an Answer to the Petition in the alternative. #8 (es) |
Filing 8 First APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Habeas Corpus Petition; Declaration of Nathan Guttman filed by Respondent Neil McDowell. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Guttman, Nathan) |
Filing 10 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by petitioner William Jones. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-02368-AG(AFM). Case referred from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for DISCOVERY. The case number will now read as follows: 2:20-cv-05361-JLS-AFM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jgu) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Respondent Neil McDowell. Related Case(s): 18-02368 (Guttman, Nathan) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Nathan Guttman on behalf of Respondent Neil McDowell (Attorney Nathan Guttman added to party Neil McDowell(pty:res))(Guttman, Nathan) |
Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER/RETURN TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: Any Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by 7/20/2020. Respondent Neil McDowell shall file an Answer to the Petition not later than 8/3/2020. Within 30 days of the date of service of the answer, Petitioner may file a single reply responding to matters raised in it. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent Form) (ib) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111/CV69) (jtil) |
Filing 2 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner William Jones. (jtil) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner William Jones. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: William Jones v. Neil McDowell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Neil McDowell | |
Represented By: | Nathan Guttman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: William Jones | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.